Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,650 posts)
2. Bad title (and incorrect comment)
Fri Feb 21, 2025, 06:42 PM
Feb 2025

They held the application in abeyance, knowing that the issue could become moot in three business days.

They did not reject it.

In fact - with only two justices saying that they would have rejected the appeal - this could be taken as a message to the lower court to not turn the TRO into a preliminary order.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rules that ...»Reply #2