Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

hadEnuf

(3,530 posts)

3. Am I missing something here?

Reply to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Fri Feb 21, 2025, 01:51 PM

Feb 2025

Administrative judges operate separately from judges who preside over federal courts, who are known as Article III judges for the section of the U.S. Constitution that established the judiciary.

Sounds pretty Constitutional to me. The DOJ does not interpret the Constitution so they can arbitrarily fire judges.

These MAGATs are playing fast and loose with the Constitution. Once they literally discard it, how do we address that and enforce it again?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US declares administrative law judge removal rules unconstitutional [View all] BumRushDaShow Feb 2025 OP

This administration is stretching my vocabulary. But shit show is the only word I can come up with right now. Walleye Feb 2025 #1

Clusterfuck? Easterncedar Feb 2025 #2

FUBAR? coprolite Feb 2025 #6

Yes, good one, very accurate Walleye Feb 2025 #8

Am I missing something here? hadEnuf Feb 2025 #3

I agree about the Executive overlording over what is "Constitutional"... except BumRushDaShow Feb 2025 #5

I think you misread that neohippie Feb 2025 #7

Administrative Law Judges James48 Feb 2025 #4