Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ancianita

(42,955 posts)
12. Turns out that the U.S. Marshal service is tainted now and getting careless. It
Thu Feb 20, 2025, 10:45 PM
Feb 2025

has an important and long history in law enforcement, but it's become too political.

Criticism and controversy
An audit by the Office of Inspector General (OIG) (November 2010) of the Justice Department found "weaknesses in the USMS's efforts to secure federal court facilities in the six USMS district offices we visited".[80]
The report found, among other things, that the Marshals Service's Judicial Security Division had contracted private security firms to provide Court Security Officers without having completed background checks.
Another incident involved the Marshals Service awarding a $300 million contract to a security guard company named USProtect Corporation, which had a known history of numerous criminal activities leading to convictions for mail fraud and bank fraud and false insurance claims in addition to a civil judgment against its chief financial officer.
Technical problems included court security officers not being properly trained on security screening equipment, which also meant equipment not being used. The OIG noted that in February 2009, several courthouses failed to detect mock explosives sent by Marshals Service Headquarters in order to test security procedures. They also found that 18% of court security officers had outdated firearms qualifications.

Internal thefts
On March 26, 2009, the body of Deputy U.S. Marshal Vincent Bustamante was discovered in Juárez, Mexico, according to the Marshals Service.
Bustamante, who was accused of stealing and pawning government property, was a fugitive from the law at the time of his death. Chihuahua State Police said the body had multiple wounds to the head – apparently consistent with an execution-style shooting.[81]

In January 2007, Deputy U.S. Marshal John Thomas Ambrose was charged with theft of Justice Department property, disclosure of confidential information, and lying to federal agents during an investigation. Deputy Ambrose had been in charge of protecting mobster-turned-informant Nicholas Calabrese, who was instrumental in sending three mob bosses to prison for life.[82] A federal jury convicted Ambrose on April 27, 2009, of leaking secret government information concerning Calabrese to William Guide, a family friend and former Chicago police officer who had also served time in prison for corruption. Ambrose also was convicted of theft of government property but acquitted of lying to federal agents.[83] On October 27, 2009, Ambrose was sentenced to serve four years in prison.[84]

Racial discrimination
In 1998, retired Chief Deputy U.S. Marshal Matthew Fogg won a landmark EEO and Title VII racial discrimination and retaliation lawsuit against the Justice Department, for which he was awarded $4 million.
The jury found the entire Marshals Service to be a "racially hostile environment" which discriminates against black employees in its promotion practices.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson summarized the jurors' decision by stating that they felt there was an "atmosphere of racial disharmony and mistrust within the United States Marshal Service".[85][86]
As of 2011, Fogg is president of "Bigots with Badges",[86] and executive director of CARCLE (Congress Against Racism and Corruption in Law Enforcement), and is also associated with Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), a drug law reform organization of law enforcement officers.[87]

In September 2023, U.S. Marshals Service settled a $15 million, nearly 30-year-old EEOC class action lawsuit filed by Matthew Fogg in January, 1994. Alleging discrimination against African-American Deputy U.S. Marshal applicants, employees and Detention Officers with regard to hiring, promotions, recruitment and headquarter assignments.[88]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Marshals_Service

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not the onion? SheltieLover Feb 2025 #1
The Onion and Borowitz DENVERPOPS Feb 2025 #28
This is some fresh evil. dchill Feb 2025 #2
Next they will give him his own Resolute desk. Baitball Blogger Feb 2025 #3
They can give Musk the original Resolute Desk. speak easy Feb 2025 #13
So are we taxpayers paying for Elon's security detail now Walleye Feb 2025 #4
??? Are they federal employees? Good question. Or 'special' employees? Norrrm Feb 2025 #7
They now have a shit ton of immunity Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2025 #11
Next comes bodyguards for DENVERPOPS Feb 2025 #15
Trump voters want to emulate him by never admitting they are wrong Walleye Feb 2025 #26
They're definitely getting paid with taxpayer dollars Wiz Imp Feb 2025 #27
He's. A. Fucking. Private. Citizen. Karasu Feb 2025 #5
they will just unfold this bit by bit, day by day, each thing outrageous but not enough to galvanize the people Blues Heron Feb 2025 #6
It's called "incrementalism" and your description exactly matches that of 1930's germans. PSPS Feb 2025 #21
Keep an Eye on the Federal Marshal Nictuku Feb 2025 #8
Turns out that the U.S. Marshal service is tainted now and getting careless. It ancianita Feb 2025 #12
With no background checks. iemanja Feb 2025 #9
Does every Federal Law Enforcement Agency suck up to DJT? malthaussen Feb 2025 #10
Does Elon get one of those little Herschel Walker badges? rubbersole Feb 2025 #14
Tell me again how Musk isn't president! n/t slightlv Feb 2025 #16
at least we don't have to pay for it Blue_playwright Feb 2025 #17
Fascist pigs abuse of power. nt yaesu Feb 2025 #18
So they can commit crimes with federal immunity dalton99a Feb 2025 #19
True, but honestly, does anyone think they couldn't before? Shipwack Feb 2025 #24
What were these guys before today? Hired thugs with no legal restraints? It seemed to me they could have been resisted Ford_Prefect Feb 2025 #20
That's fucked up. Solly Mack Feb 2025 #22
Any one of the 94 district US Marshals could have deputized these bodyguards on behalf of Trumpf/Musk. C0RI0LANUS Feb 2025 #23
Would this detail also be charged with collecting the roses that the masses throw at his feet? EarthFirst Feb 2025 #25
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Elon Musk's private secur...»Reply #12