Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

BumRushDaShow

(145,074 posts)

6. Yeah but it would still have to get through the Senate cloture

Reply to LymphocyteLover (Reply #5)

Tue Dec 24, 2024, 09:11 AM

Dec 24

of 60 votes and they don't have it. And I know the GOP has threatened to do what we kept pushing to do - get rid of that Rule or at least make it a "talking filibuster". But we shall see.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

raging moderate migeorge SCantiGOP

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Biden vetoes once-bipartisan effort to add 66 federal judgeships, citing 'hurried' House action [View all] BumRushDaShow Dec 24 OP

I trust Joe. He knows something about this we don't. Joinfortmill Dec 24 #1

The GOP House sat on this bill until after the election BumRushDaShow Dec 24 #2

Yep, he knows he doesn't want to give the nazi's a chance to appoint additional judges ove the next 4 years. Think. Again. Dec 24 #3

Goooood! Prairie Gates Dec 24 #4

Good, although I imagine Repubs will bring this up again in the new term LymphocyteLover Dec 24 #5

Yeah but it would still have to get through the Senate cloture BumRushDaShow Dec 24 #6

That's fair...let them try Prairie Gates Dec 24 #7

This message was self-deleted by its author dalton99a Dec 24 #8

Can't the incoming Congress just pass it again? Polybius Dec 24 #9

It wouldn't make it through the Senate without 60 votes now BumRushDaShow Dec 24 #10

Ahh, I didn't realize it could be filibustered Polybius Dec 24 #11

"Confirmations" (both Executive and Judical Branch) had the "nuclear option" applied BumRushDaShow Dec 24 #12

Correct. GB_RN Dec 24 #13