Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(145,205 posts)
6. The "Windfall Elimination Provision" (1983) passed as an amendment to the Social Security Act
Fri Dec 13, 2024, 12:08 PM
Dec 13
(snip)

This provision eliminates gaps in protection for Federal employees, particularly those who shift between Federal employment and jobs already covered under Social Security. In addition, over the long run, windfall Social Security benefits will be eliminated for these employees. The provision increases revenues by $9.4 billion for 1984-89 and has a long-range saving of .28 percent of taxable payroll.

(snip)

Prohibit Termination of Coverage of State and Local Government Employees

Prohibits States from terminating coverage of State and local government employees if the termination has not gone into effect by the date of enactment (4/20/83). Under prior law, a State could terminate coverage for groups of State and local employees by giving 2 years' advance written notice, providing the coverage had been in effect for at least 5 years. Also, permits State and local groups whose coverage has been terminated to be covered again. Prior law prohibited a terminated group from being covered again. This provision avoids gaps in protection for State and local employees (and their families) whose coverage would otherwise have been terminated. Further, it reduces the loss to the trust funds due to payment of "windfalls"--benefits which represent a high return on Social Security taxes for terminated workers compared with the lower return for those with a lifetime of covered work. The provision increases revenues by $3.2 billion for 1983-89 and has a long-range saving of .06 percent of taxable payroll.

(snip)

https://www.ssa.gov/history/1983amend2.html


Basically, anyone who had a job that collected the SS payroll tax and that individual also had a work history in a job that wasn't covered under SS (generally federal/state/county/municipal government workers and some non-profits - at least pre-1980s), then when it comes time for retirement, the eligible SS payout portion might be reduced or eliminated as a "windfall" for that person, which would be in addition to the retiree's regular pension/annuity (even if the person had been fully vested with at least 40 quarters in SS).

This new legislation would repeal that provision.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»O'Malley: Calling Social ...»Reply #6