Announcements
In reply to the discussion: A word about the ongoing Democratic presidential primaries [View all]Bad Dog
(2,027 posts)As always the devil's in the detail. I have no trouble with suspected terrorists and criminals being spied on, provided they get clearance from a judge. I am against mass data trawling not just because it's an abuse of privacy but because it doesn't work. Wading through heaps of data has not resulted in one successful prosecution, unlike targeted intelligence led surveillance. This bill has been knocked back to the committee stage so we'll have to see what they come up with, but we don't want to give the government extra powers than can be abused. And they will abuse them given the chance, they always do. There must be adequate safeguards put in place.
Incidentally when a Labour government tried this the Tories were up in arms against it. Guess they didn't fancy being spied on by MI5 either.