Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(304 posts)

16. and the court also said that the verdict was basically a special one time thing so that it could be used against them in

Thu Jul 2, 2026, 03:08 PM

3 hrs ago

the future... though they would happily do it again for a R..

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Remember when the Supreme Court stole an election? [View all] SamuelAdams 7 hrs ago OP

12/12/2000 - the day journalism died 31st Street Bridge 6 hrs ago #1

Those that objected were shouted down MustLoveBeagles 5 hrs ago #6

That was even Al Gore's response orthoclad 3 hrs ago #15

They stopped counting to protect Bush's "win" crud 6 hrs ago #2

The intent of the voter was the law in Florida in 2000 DemocracyForever 5 hrs ago #3

I was headed to Florida for the recount when this decision came down LetMyPeopleVote 5 hrs ago #4

Thank you MustLoveBeagles 5 hrs ago #5

Unfortunately Pas-de-Calais 5 hrs ago #7

In Exquisite Detail, OP. ColoringFool 5 hrs ago #8

I still remember but, I've put it all behind me.... chouchou 5 hrs ago #9

Yes, the Court should have been reformed at that time... kentuck 5 hrs ago #11

Sandra Day O'Connor's shameful legacy Easterncedar 4 hrs ago #12

Gore offered Bush a statewide count DemocracyForever 4 hrs ago #13

Yes indeed Deminpenn 3 hrs ago #14

They rioted to stop the count. orthoclad 3 hrs ago #17