Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Doodley

(12,096 posts)
2. How does that help pay for the food, health, and shelter of the tens of millions of people who will lose their jobs
Mon Jun 1, 2026, 10:09 AM
10 hrs ago

because of AI? This is a problem of our political system, where we have only two parties and one party doesn't give a f**k about the people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No. QueerDuck 10 hrs ago #1
Why not? highplainsdem 9 hrs ago #3
A 50% STATE TAKEOVER of private companies is not the answer... it's overreach. QueerDuck 5 hrs ago #24
Ownership of an AI built on public data is just. It gives the public class action standing in federal court. ancianita 4 hrs ago #28
How does that help pay for the food, health, and shelter of the tens of millions of people who will lose their jobs Doodley 10 hrs ago #2
It isn't enough. Ideally, generative AI models trained illegally should be destroyed, with new legal AI models highplainsdem 9 hrs ago #4
I understand what you are saying, but the genie is already out of the bottle. This is where we are, and Doodley 9 hrs ago #6
Just using AI dumbs users down and makes them dependent on AI. There are few if any good uses highplainsdem 9 hrs ago #9
With all due respect, have you used it much? Doodley 8 hrs ago #14
I've used it enough to know how it works and how tempting it can seem. And I've read thousands of highplainsdem 8 hrs ago #19
With all due respect, I don't think you understand how incredibly useful AI is. Doodley 7 hrs ago #21
With all due respect, you asked AI to give you ideas and tell you where to shop. IMO that's an example highplainsdem 7 hrs ago #22
With all due respect, you are making a lot of assumptions. Doodley 6 hrs ago #23
My "assumptions" were based on what you'd told me. highplainsdem 2 hrs ago #29
Try all it's tech we paid for. In-Q-Tel funds or should I just say CIA. Blue Full Moon 9 hrs ago #5
I don't want to own it. I want it to not exist. WhiskeyGrinder 9 hrs ago #7
Agreed. MineralMan 9 hrs ago #8
Same here. But as I said above, in the meantime I like seeing regulations and penalties on AI suggested highplainsdem 9 hrs ago #11
YES! Emile 9 hrs ago #10
sigh... WarGamer 9 hrs ago #12
It isn't true that "Training is Learning, Not Storing" - that's AI company propaganda to try to defend highplainsdem 8 hrs ago #15
Thanks for the information. There is also a lot of people who have formed an opinion about AI Doodley 8 hrs ago #16
See reply 15. highplainsdem 8 hrs ago #20
Well, he's halfway there. BlueTsunami2018 9 hrs ago #13
Bingo!!! Doodley 8 hrs ago #17
While everyone is debating the issue xuplate 8 hrs ago #18
Norway has a sovereign wealth fund on oil and they're almost always ranked at the top of the list of happiest nations. Uncle Joe 5 hrs ago #25
The AI bubble is on the cusp of a crash Bev54 4 hrs ago #26
Didn't Cervantes Write A Book About Bernie? ColoringFool 4 hrs ago #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie Sanders: The Publi...»Reply #2