General Discussion

House of Roberts

(6,671 posts)

36. American Prospect is not 'admitting' anything.

Reply to sarisataka (Reply #34)

Sat May 30, 2026, 03:57 PM

Yesterday

He had no idea that it had Nazi connotations or resembled the Nazi Totenkopf. He has since altered it.

They are reporting what Platner has said repeatedly.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

kcoates

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

AIPAC and Auchincloss: Why is a Democratic congressman from Massachusetts attacking Graham Platner? [View all] Celerity Friday OP

Maybe because he's Jewish and he doesn't want a guy with a Nazi tattoo as a nominee. nycbos Friday #1

"Why are we OK with a guy who had an SS tattoo and a person who made apologies for rape?" House of Roberts Yesterday #4

What about his posts blaming women for being raped? He did not niyad Yesterday #6

Maybe you should ask that question of Auchincloss, since it didn't bother him House of Roberts Yesterday #7

Well, I first learned about them on DU. niyad Yesterday #8

OK, when were these posts originated? House of Roberts Yesterday #9

In all my years working with Domestic Violence, and sexual assault, niyad Yesterday #10

The posts were recent. Look it up. yardwork Yesterday #16

Yes. I believe it was for using "retarded", iirc. yorkster Yesterday #28

According to an article by Liz Goodwin in the Washington Post, House of Roberts Yesterday #30

Your googling skills are that poor? yardwork Yesterday #41

I agree that we could have done better, but apparently we aren't going to. So this is the guy. Scrivener7 23 hrs ago #54

I suppose 2013 could be seen as "recent" if one wishes it so. Nt AloeVera 23 hrs ago #55

From what I gleaned in the article I read Mossfern Yesterday #45

I believe that is different messages. House of Roberts Yesterday #46

It is a Nazi tattoo. yardwork Yesterday #15

There's a couple of problems with that EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #25

"Discredited" -you are going to have to provide evidence sarisataka Yesterday #31

Your argument is with the American Prospect. House of Roberts Yesterday #33

Interesting sarisataka Yesterday #34

American Prospect is not 'admitting' anything. House of Roberts Yesterday #36

That is his claim sarisataka Yesterday #39

Fine. Tell it to them. House of Roberts Yesterday #40

But you're citing it which suggests a certain level of belief in it given the rest of your post EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #47

the rising antisemitism in the party is going to bite us in the ass mopinko Yesterday #12

Auchincloss and AIPAC want to look forward and move on Ponietz Friday #2

There is no evidence that Epstein worked for Israel. yardwork Yesterday #17

There's ample circumstantial evidence for anyone that cares to look Ponietz Yesterday #21

There's ample circumstantial evidence that Trump is a mutant from outer space. yardwork Yesterday #24

Weak sauce Ponietz Yesterday #26

For God's sake! Look at the war on Iran exactly when they needed a distraction! Ponietz Yesterday #27

That is a ridiculous statement. nt PufPuf23 19 hrs ago #58

Here's the Key from the article Bettie Yesterday #3

That part is from my Wikipedia excerpt, exposing Auchincloss. Glad to see it helped. Celerity Yesterday #5

It's good to expose the truth. yardwork Yesterday #19

We have a centrist problem. Emile Yesterday #11

Hear Hear! (n/t) OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #13

Auchincloss has a controversial past himself TVguyCards Yesterday #14

"Corporate Establishment Centrist Dems Bad Conspiracy AIPAC AIPAC AIPAC: Nice Progressives Oppressed." betsuni Yesterday #18

That's the problem in this thread. yardwork Yesterday #20

Fuck AIPAC. Put that in your cigar and smoke it. Intractable Yesterday #32

Imagine denying AIPAC spending big money in our elections SunImp Yesterday #37

This message was self-deleted by its author Ponietz 23 hrs ago #49

And never forget they used GOP dollars to hamstring us with dead weight like Fetterman Ponietz 20 hrs ago #57

Utterly predictable. MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #44

Not Helpful Aepps22 Yesterday #22

DURec leftstreet Yesterday #23

This guy votes with party 90% of the time. Emile Yesterday #29

I'm already seeing redditors say AIPAC is responsible for him sexting other women thebigidea Yesterday #35

Many of us predicted that more would come out. yardwork Yesterday #42

K & R. Xavier Breath Yesterday #38

This is an "outrageous attack"? MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #43

Sing it! yardwork Yesterday #48

The one attacking Platner over his background has a questionable background of his own AZProgressive 23 hrs ago #50

Federal elections and officials affect all of us. RandySF 23 hrs ago #51

Which is why I so hope Auchincloss is defeated in his next Dem primary. Celerity 23 hrs ago #52

Fair enough. RandySF 23 hrs ago #53

Ratioed. lapucelle 23 hrs ago #56