Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ocelot II

(131,431 posts)
4. The alternative is that the military - that's the government, which is us taxpayers, pay their way,
Sat May 30, 2026, 10:09 AM
23 hrs ago

and I'm not down with that either. What's wrong is that military personnel are being recruited to supply the optics for this spectacle because they don't want UFC's usual audience of dumpy white trash MAGA guys wearing greasy t-shirts and pants with their butt cracks showing. They want an audience of fit, handsome male soldiers in their dress uniforms because it will look good for the cameras. Which makes me wonder, if a soldier wanted to go to some other UFC event on his own time, would he wear his dress uniform? I think not. And isn't there a specific rule about military personnel being prohibited from wearing their uniforms "during or in connection with the furtherance of political activities, private employment or commercial interests, when an inference of official sponsorship for the activity or interest could be drawn"? 32 CFR 53.2

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Attn: Military Personnel ...»Reply #4