Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

betsuni

(29,364 posts)
77. Opportunity economy, middle class, small business, first-time house buyer subsidy, corporate price gouging,
Thu May 28, 2026, 12:25 AM
Thursday

Medicare coverage for in-home health care, higher wages, tax billionaires, more apprenticeships and end requiring college degrees for federal jobs, helping farmers, etc etc etc.

It's ALWAYS horseshit and why does anyone believe it or spread it around.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes! leftieNanner May 27 #1
Yes, he must do many things at once senseandsensibility May 27 #3
It's a big ask of anyone peggysue2 May 27 #41
Kick dalton99a May 27 #2
It is also important he confronts MAGA christianity about their bastardization of Christianity. travelingthrulife May 27 #4
I'm not particularly religious so maybe I'm not a good judge senseandsensibility May 27 #5
Agreed. I am not religious either. His voice is important. travelingthrulife Thursday #87
The distinction is between Christian Nationalism and Christianity. pat_k May 27 #30
That is a must-see for clarity. Festivito May 27 #65
That sermon put him on my radar at the end of 2023. pat_k May 27 #67
They aren't all Christian Nationalists though, many just have a really hateful interpretation travelingthrulife Thursday #88
If they have no interest in discriminating or reshaping law in accord with their beliefs, they aren't violating... pat_k Thursday #91
Christian nationalism is part of the Christopretensism phenomenon Jose Flavio Sanchez Friday #97
Spot On! pat_k Friday #100
My thoughts exactly. That's why I've thought that Talarico was particularly needed at this time. summer_in_TX May 27 #42
This is great. I want to share with my fundie Trump lovers in my family. But its way too small to read for them LiberalLovinLug Thursday #94
Here's a larger image. summer_in_TX Thursday #95
Defend democracy from christopretendocracy Jose Flavio Sanchez Friday #98
True Jose Flavio Sanchez Friday #99
Trump needed no defining leftstreet May 27 #6
Magas are and were a lost cause senseandsensibility May 27 #7
No. "MAGA" is mainly about 30 million Bluetus May 27 #11
Good points senseandsensibility May 27 #12
I would say Obama was elected to bring us a public option in healthcare questionseverything May 27 #22
But he hedged so much about it that he had no mandate. Bluetus May 27 #33
That's not true Mad_Machine76 May 27 #50
That is not my recollection Bluetus May 27 #58
Here's a link from Wikipedia that appears to support my recollection of events Mad_Machine76 May 27 #59
I don't deny that Lieberman screwed the pooch Bluetus May 27 #62
I believe, however, that it was near the end of the passage of the ACA Mad_Machine76 May 27 #64
I am sure the truth lies somewhere in that region. Politics can be very ugly Bluetus May 27 #66
Disagree questionseverything May 27 #61
I still genuinely believe if the Dems had RAMMED Medicare for all Americans through in 2009, we never PatrickforB May 27 #36
The biggest problem is that we pay into Medicare throughout our spooky3 May 27 #72
Nah, with all due respect, your post would have us all dancing at the end of the same string. PatrickforB Thursday #76
I suggest that you do some reading on the problems in our health care spooky3 Thursday #78
+1 leftstreet May 27 #23
Not this again... lame54 May 27 #43
+a zillion nt spooky3 May 27 #71
Opportunity economy, middle class, small business, first-time house buyer subsidy, corporate price gouging, betsuni Thursday #77
FDR who said... mountain grammy Thursday #84
I thought Kamala ran an excellent campaign PatSeg May 27 #8
I remember marveling at how good Kamala was during the debates senseandsensibility May 27 #10
I agree that gender was against her PatSeg May 27 #52
You have to draw contrasts Bluetus May 27 #35
Except I would get rid of the 'fight hard' clause. My email box and mobile text fills up every day with dozens PatrickforB May 27 #40
Good point. Bluetus May 27 #56
Sorry for,having to say this, but.... reACTIONary May 27 #70
Maybe not the best strategy SomedayKindaLove Thursday #79
Step one for Congress is heal thyself (insider trading is legal?!) Soul_of_Wit May 27 #48
Yes, as long as the examples are totally legitimate PatSeg May 27 #55
IDK Lemon Lyman May 27 #9
They needed to speak more about what what people needed wnylib May 27 #24
Picking a convicted felon over competency is entirely because of not solving issues like housing and affordability (n/m) Soul_of_Wit May 27 #49
There's a bit more to it. wnylib May 27 #54
Here is exactly what I was talking about. wnylib May 27 #63
do not forget the double standard Skittles May 27 #13
Yes, in many ways that is the elephant in the room senseandsensibility May 27 #14
she always had to avoid looking like the "angry black woman" Skittles May 27 #17
It is a fact. Do we want to have our principles or do we want to win some elections so we can make these things right? Bluetus May 27 #38
The one (principles) does not deny the other (victory) Torchlight May 27 #47
It has so far. Bluetus May 27 #57
Three key failures that were incredibly frustrating to watch. pat_k May 27 #15
Kamala's problem was she was a woman. Just saying, people. Joinfortmill May 27 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed Thursday #90
Like it or not, negative ads and action works. Good for him. NNadir May 27 #18
Kamala should have challenged TSF to a polygraph test in the debates. Rhiagel May 27 #19
I worked for an attorney The Wizard May 27 #34
Research on polygraphs shows they are not sufficiently reliable, eg, see spooky3 May 27 #74
He knew his client was lying to him The Wizard Thursday #83
I understand that, but people widely believe polygraphs are spooky3 Thursday #89
Nailed it orangecrush May 27 #20
The only reason Harris lost is that she isn't a white male. ananda May 27 #21
Thank you. /nt spudspud May 27 #26
Yeah. I can hear the complaints from the always anti-Democrat morons: Zelda_Orchid May 27 #27
Running for the Senate MineralMan May 27 #25
He is also being a white male... displacedvermoter May 27 #28
Every Democrat running for office needs to blast the republicOn party KS Toronado May 27 #29
Can we please not do this? Politicub May 27 #31
In LBJ's first run for Congress he The Wizard May 27 #32
Wow senseandsensibility May 27 #37
More corrupt than Trump? lame54 May 27 #39
You don't define an opponent with a single interview. RandySF May 27 #44
I am not sure one can ever define an opponent especially one as creepy as his. Best to just constantly define yourself. efhmc May 27 #73
what she absolutely did not do that cost her votes yobrault1 May 27 #45
Democrats need to be better at multitasking Soul_of_Wit May 27 #46
The DNC could learn something from this guy gay texan May 27 #51
Last night, Paxton broke out every stereotype from the Trump book he could find. ificandream May 27 #53
I see.... sheshe2 May 27 #60
Ummm... Unca Jim May 27 #68
She called Trump an "unhinged and unstable" fascist ... oh wait, it's Kamala the Invisible, like all the betsuni May 27 #69
Lawrence asked a repuke style question painting Rep Talarico with the pro trans kids brush. Tbear May 27 #75
What? He isn't a Black woman? ananda Thursday #80
Its called branding Historic NY Thursday #81
I don't know, in those debates she pasted Trump pretty good bucolic_frolic Thursday #82
You have a point, especially after 45 years of incessant smearing of liberals lostnfound Thursday #85
Also bring up every time Old Crank Thursday #86
K&R red dog 1 Thursday #92
Ay, ay, ay, que rico Talarico Miami Blue Thursday #93
He's got the ads directed at Hispanics................ Lovie777 Friday #101
"the most corrupt politician in America" Danascot Friday #96
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I see that James Talarico...»Reply #77