Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

manicdem

(560 posts)
10. Downsides
Mon May 25, 2026, 04:37 PM
May 25

Commercial trucking already pays a good bit of the taxes. The problem if they pay all the taxes is the added costs will be passed on to the consumer. This will mean people that don't own cars will be paying the taxes for people that own cars.

Commercial current taxes:
Heavy Vehicle Use Tax (HVUT): Commercial motor vehicles with a gross weight of 55,000 pounds or more must pay this annual federal tax, often referred to as Form 2290. It costs ($100) plus ($22) for each 1,000 pounds over 55,000 lbs, capping at a maximum of ($550) per year for vehicles over 75,000 lbs.

International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA): Rather than paying fuel taxes at every pump, IFTA is filed quarterly so commercial drivers pay specific rates based on the gallons consumed in each state they travel through. Current tax rates vary widely by jurisdiction, typically ranging from ($0.30) to over ($0.60) per gallon depending on the state. Check exact quarterly rates per state using the IFTA Tax Matrix.

Weight-Distance or Mileage Taxes: States like Oregon, New York (NY HUT), Kentucky (KYU), and New Mexico charge commercial vehicles operating within their borders a specific tax per mile, directly tied to the truck's loaded weight.

Other Licensing Fees: Motor carriers pay annual fees for the International Registration Plan (IRP) to legally apportion license plates across multiple states.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Make sense that there's an annual fee for road usage. Melon May 25 #1
I did not say that I don't think we should fund the roads. AllyCat May 25 #8
Outrageous... California already has something like 200-300 in annual EV fees... WarGamer May 25 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Melon May 25 #3
Downsides manicdem May 25 #10
Ya, my CA tags were $800 for my (leased) EV SUV this year. haele May 25 #12
make fossil fuel users pay for the costs of global climate chage instead DBoon May 25 #4
My plug in Prius weighs WAY less Bettie May 25 #5
OR: Eliminate The Gas Tax. Institute A Vehicle Tax. You Drive,.... ColoringFool May 25 #6
Others have thought of this. Weight and miles driven. AllyCat May 25 #9
Proposal makes sense manicdem May 25 #7
I wouldn't consider a RAV4 similar to a Tesla sedan. AllyCat May 25 #13
You'd have to make an apples to apples comparison manicdem May 25 #15
Doesn't matter. I am buying MORE fuel than my husband. AllyCat May 25 #16
example manicdem May 25 #17
Other vehicles are NOT taxed by weight. AllyCat May 25 #19
Honestly, it doesn't seem like an onerous fee Bettie May 25 #11
Why should we pay more than ICE owners? AllyCat May 25 #14
For me, it's because I like driving on decent roads Bettie May 25 #20
Correct. I do not disagree that we should cover our AllyCat May 25 #21
Given that, then yes, a number closer to 90 Bettie May 25 #22
Democrats aren't in a rush to pass universal healthcare but they can't wait to tax EV's. Renew Deal May 25 #18
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Paying their fair share'...»Reply #10