Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

slightlv

(8,058 posts)
15. I can appreciate Truman's reasoning here, but just like
Sat May 23, 2026, 09:58 AM
May 23

Bush and his "Homeland Security" if you give people in any department...especially one you create specifically... the power will always go above and beyond what was intended. Money corrupts; but power corrupts even worse than money. And here we are... the CIA, DOJ, and FBI (as well as all the subsidiary policing forces) are allied against the very people they were suppose to protect.

We live now in a police state, where bad words against trump can get you arrested or killed. We no longer have rights and privileges as per our Constitution. That Constitution has been torn to pieces and taped back together as a quasi "rights of confederation" ala the Deep South.

That Truman and others couldn't see the dangers these departments would cause with a pitiful, sorrowful, reality-denying South is a demerit against any and all presidents who didn't try to rein in these departments. And that includes all parties. The best we can hope for now is to turn these agencies against trump, his administrative minions, and maga in general in order to make our country back into something of which it once resembled. And, once that is done, truly and really kill most of these departments. When we started imprisoning more people here in the US than they do in China, it should have been a red flag warning these policing powers were out of control.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It is always about power, control, money. Irish_Dem May 23 #1
Yup, follow the money. Venazuela has the largest reserves of oil... Now we control in. Who has the mitch96 May 23 #21
PNAC Lives Kid Berwyn May 23 #2
Had Alan Dulles not spearheaded the overthrow of Iran's government in 1953, Iran might be an ally today. Lonestarblue May 23 #9
I can appreciate Truman's reasoning here, but just like slightlv May 23 #15
If the Venezuelans realize that Delcy turned Maduro in, those in his inner circle Baitball Blogger May 23 #3
Absolutely, gab13by13 May 23 #4
I believe it was to Jack the price of oil 100%. It pays off the onshore big oil donors who were next in line first Cheezoholic May 23 #5
I thought that the position of president in Iran wnylib May 23 #6
My scorecard looks very different GreatGazoo May 23 #7
Nice post, I like it, gab13by13 May 23 #10
I like your points about more than oil needs to move through Hormuz GreatGazoo May 23 #18
And Iranians will never forget . . . AverageOldGuy May 23 #8
Maybe if Democrats regain control of government gab13by13 May 23 #12
And we keep giving them more things to "remember"... Wounded Bear May 23 #13
Why does the press never challenge Trump when he spews these absurd lies? OGBuzz May 23 #11
If that indeed was the "plan" it was a stupid plan from the get go. onenote May 23 #14
Not to mention that gab13by13 May 23 #16
We had better plans when we played army as kids and we were 6 years old. surfered May 23 #17
Did Kraznov really *think* he could achieve regime change in Iran, then control their oil? Martin Eden May 23 #19
I think Ahmadenijad is dead. ChicagoTeamster May 23 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We Now Know With Certaint...»Reply #15