Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)On Tax Day, Mamdani Taxed the Rich [View all]
The mayor, his supporters, and public opinion convinced their previously reluctant governor to agree to a tax on the second (or third, fourth, fifth, etc.) homes of their citys nonresident rich.
https://prospect.org/2026/04/16/mamdani-hochul-new-york-pied-a-terre-tax-the-rich/

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani waves during an address marking his first hundred days in office, April 12, 2026, at the Knockdown Center in New York. Credit: Andres Kudacki/AP Photo
Six months after Gov. Kathy Hochul scolded New Yorkers for telling her to tax the rich, she joined New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani to do just that. The two officials instituted a pied-à-terre tax on second homes worth over $5 million, a fee that would apply to the ultra-wealthy who store their wealth in New York City real estate but who dont actually live here, Mamdani said in a video announcement of the new tax set to music that sounds like the theme song to Succession.
Theyre able to reap the huge financial rewards of owning property in, dare I say, the greatest city in the world, Mamdani said, and most of the time the units sit empty. This is a fundamentally unfair system that hurts working New Yorkers. He gave examples of the types of homes hes talking about, including billionaire Ken Griffins $238 million penthouse in Midtown, once the most expensive home in the country, and Russian auto dealer Alexander Varshavskys $20.5 million property, which he bought in cash. Mamdani counted thousands more similarly opulent homes owned by foreign oligarchs and the global ultra-rich.
The new fee would bring in about $500 million annually, less than 10 percent of the citys projected budget deficit of $5.4 billion. Nonetheless, its a crack in Hochuls stone wall against the idea of applying any new tax against the rich, which shes maintained for months. At a rally for the Mamdani mayoral campaign in October, New Yorkers chanted Tax the rich at Hochul when she took the stage. Initially, she pretended that she thought the audience was yelling Lets go, Bills, in reference to the NFL team from Buffalo. Then she tried other ways to get out of the intensely popular demand, including repeating the lie that taxes on the ultra-wealthy prompt them to leave, which has repeatedly been proven untrue, and saying that having to listen to a repeat request from the constituents she serves is akin to her having to put up with a lot of crap.
I hear you, Hochul said a month later when some in the audience at a political conference in Puerto Rico told her to tax the rich. But Im the type of person, the more you push me, the more Im not going to do what you want. So little lesson to all of our friends out there. Later, she told reporters that Buffalo natives dont put up with a lot of crap, adding, You look at the history of people whove run multimillion-dollar ad campaigns to try and get me to change my position. I dont change my position. But that was 2025, and her constituents did not shut up. Not only did Mamdani continue to advocate for taxing the rich, but the massive volunteer network built during his campaign did as well. Volunteers knocked on doors to tell their neighbors that Hochul was standing in the way of Mamdanis project to tax the rich, plugging in with the new 501(c)(4) Our Time to sign up for canvassing shifts. Unlike 501(c)(3) nonprofits, 501(c)(4) organizations can lobby.
snip
22 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
People talk about rich people leaving a town if they're taxed as if that's a bad thing.
Scrivener7
Saturday
#1
I'm glad she got out of Mamdani's way on this issue. It IS worth doing. The ultra-rich need to pay their way. ...n/t
CaliforniaPeggy
Saturday
#2
Thanks so much, my dear Celerity! My recovery is pretty sluggish, but it's happening.
CaliforniaPeggy
Saturday
#5
I believe the intention was to get property tax dollars out of those who were leaving the city...
PeaceWave
Saturday
#6
Also, NYC has become the land of money laundering absentee owners. Saudis and billionaires and
Scrivener7
Saturday
#9
They would get a lot more revenue this way, because it would apply to all owners, whether they lived there or not.
MichMan
Yesterday
#12
Again, they could have chosen that, but they seem to want to go after the absentee owners with this.
Scrivener7
Yesterday
#13
