Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onenote

(46,160 posts)
36. The language of the amendment doesn't help your argument.
Wed Apr 8, 2026, 06:00 PM
16 hrs ago

Last edited Wed Apr 8, 2026, 06:53 PM - Edit history (1)

If you're going to hang your argument on the language of the amendment you have to address this:

Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office

Trump, unfortunately, is able to discharge the powers and duties of his office -- he can set foreign policy, he can sign or veto legislation, he can nominate executive branch officers, etc etc. The fact that he does so badly, even irrationally, doesn't mean that he is unable to do so. Put another way, it wasn't meant to address a president pursuing policies that most people hate. That's what elections are for, or where those decisions constitute high crimes and misdemeanors (including war crimes), impeachment.

The amendment was intended, as suggested above, to address a situation where the president is out of commission, not out of his mind.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 word explanation: Republicans are cowards ck4829 Monday #1
You spelled "complicit" wrong. GoCubsGo Monday #9
The 25th was meant for situations where the president was "out of action" Takket Monday #2
+1 Shrek Monday #6
What is your evidence of this? spooky3 Monday #11
because look at how the 25th is removed after it is invoked Takket Monday #23
But that's simply your view, not the language of the amendment. spooky3 Monday #24
2/3rds of the House and 2/3rds of the Senate will NOT vote to say he is unfit Celerity Tuesday #34
The language of the amendment doesn't help your argument. onenote 16 hrs ago #36
Lawrence O'Donnell disagrees. spooky3 Tuesday #31
On the other hand, Turbineguy Monday #3
We will have to wait for the midterms RainCaster Monday #4
I keep asking the question. Why don't we have a method to stop the madness? yellow dahlia Monday #5
We do. Greg_In_SF Monday #12
Relying on one thing; "elections" is not the best way to go about this, when it comes to stopping madmen ck4829 Monday #29
We definitely need more methods than just elections, that's for sure ck4829 Monday #28
Especially elections that can be rigged. yellow dahlia Monday #30
Highly unlikely mikewv Monday #7
Impeachment is actually easier from a numbers standpoint tinrobot Monday #18
Yes and it should have happened mikewv Monday #19
The word at the time was ITAL Monday #25
Coup de tete Johnny2X2X Monday #8
Even if this particular president weren't dangerously insane Ocelot II Monday #10
Vance has toadies? Who knew. I thought everyone hated him. unblock Monday #14
There are plenty of ambitious people around who would be eager to be a toady's toady. Ocelot II Monday #15
Interestingly, the skills set needed to be a good (well, let's say 'effective') dictator unblock Monday #17
Removal by impeachment is much easier, and even that ain't happening. unblock Monday #13
The majority of department heads are as crazy as he is. Sneederbunk Monday #16
Who ever thought this was a possibility? BlueTsunami2018 Monday #20
Cowards and Complicit since 2016 RANDYWILDMAN Monday #21
He's been firing his cabinet members. Rumors are he wants to fire more. Intractable Monday #22
The Republican party is complicit bob4460 Monday #26
So what do we do? He's becoming increasingly unhinged and drunk with power. Initech Monday #27
Should I hold my breath and wait for bootlicking nazi halfwits to act like decent human beings? struggle4progress Tuesday #32
This clown cabinet isn't going to bring the 25th on Krasnov. GoodRaisin Tuesday #33
Deadline Legal Blog-How the 25th Amendment would work against Trump amid his Iran belligerence LetMyPeopleVote 17 hrs ago #35
Sadly, yes. surfered 16 hrs ago #37
It's always been fantasy. WarGamer 15 hrs ago #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why the 25th Amendment wi...»Reply #36