Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(40,729 posts)
16. The best ways to halt human population growth are not coercive.
Wed Apr 8, 2026, 02:17 PM
Yesterday

The economic and political empowerment of women, universal access to birth control, and realistic sex education are very effective.

Not coincidentally, these are all things "conservatives" of many religions and political ideologies oppose.

I don't believe a brutal decline of the human population by great suffering and death is "baked in the cake." The solution to the problem is obvious but somehow hard to implement. We just have to agree that every human deserves a comfortable and secure place to live, healthy food, clean water, and basic medical care.

Most of the horrors of the modern world are brought upon us by people who do not believe this.

For various reasons I don't think fusion (excluding that which occurs in the sun) will ever be a viable energy resource for humankind. That's okay, fission works well and we've been building fission power plants for more than seventy years now. If we can halt our population growth and quit regarding one another as "consumers" to the detriment of our physical and mental health, nuclear fission can power our civilization indefinitely, beyond the "seven generation sustainability" many environmentalists talk about. ( As someone interested in evolutionary biology I tend to think in longer time scales. The beginning of the Miocene epoch was yesterday morning. )

If a was formulating a conspiracy theory I might say that "renewable energy" and fusion are being promoted for the purpose of prolonging our dependence on fossil fuels.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We could learn a lot from our European friends if we would get our head out of our ass. walkingman Yesterday #1
It has NOTHING to do with our heads up our asses. Conjuay Yesterday #2
Both are true. yardwork Yesterday #6
Scotland regularly generates an electricity surplus over its own requirements Emrys Yesterday #3
Decades of these kinds of momentary 100% reports demonstrate... NNadir Yesterday #4
This isn't a "momentary" surplus, nor is it unreliable. Emrys Yesterday #7
Nonsense. It isn't rocket science to understand that the wind doesn't blow continuously. NNadir Yesterday #9
I was just thinking the other day I hadn't seen an NNadir pro-nuke post in awhile AZJonnie Yesterday #10
Wind power will only prolong our dependence on fossil fuels. hunter Yesterday #13
Yes I've read many dozens of NNadir's posts over the years, you don't have to get me up to speed AZJonnie Yesterday #15
The best ways to halt human population growth are not coercive. hunter Yesterday #16
Nuclear power will have a similar effect Emrys Yesterday #18
Low wind and no sunshine cause renewable energy shutdowns constantly. hunter 22 hrs ago #20
Hence my emphasis throughout on a MIX of resources Emrys 21 hrs ago #23
Trashing coastal environments with tidal power schemes isn't going to save the world. hunter 17 hrs ago #25
This is now getting tiresome. I didn't realize a good news story about Scotland would bring on the nuclear fanboys. Emrys 17 hrs ago #28
Bullshit. Hickley C will be saving lives half a century after every wind turbine in Scotland has become landfill. NNadir 21 hrs ago #21
Oh, bullshit yourself. Emrys 21 hrs ago #24
Nonsense yourself. I think you fit very well the description of an ideologue Emrys Yesterday #12
Could it be that's what the fossil fuel industry wants you to think? hunter Yesterday #17
I don't know why you think that. Emrys Yesterday #19
Human ingenuity sometimes (not often, but sometimes) Torchlight Yesterday #5
really good DoBW Yesterday #8
They will need to be bombed over this and their regime changed. Too threatening to Big Oil. (SARCASM). artemisia1 Yesterday #11
Gee. Who WOULDN'T want that for the USA and planet earth? Kid Berwyn Yesterday #14
Wouldn't it be great to read, United States of America temporarily ran entirely on wind power... Passages 21 hrs ago #22
And we get coal natural gas and oil. Klarkashton 17 hrs ago #26
he hated wind power becuase Turbines were in view on the golf course he acquired. Acccording to the Clown-in-Charge, OAITW r.2.0 17 hrs ago #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scotland temporarily ran ...»Reply #16