Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

fujiyamasan

(1,770 posts)

9. Why would they ever agree to that

Reply to PeaceWave (Reply #5)

Tue Apr 7, 2026, 09:42 PM

21 hrs ago

After being attacked?

Once Trump tore up the treaty back in his first term, there was no return, and frankly I can’t blame them.

I still haven’t seen one shred of evidence they’ve been building anything. If someone has a link to actual enrichment levels, it might be a bit more convincing. It was still not a good reason for this war. This was always Bibi’s war. He’s been itching for this for decades. He found a useful idiot in Trump to follow along.

I guess I’m an idiot for taking the bait even replying here.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Chin music MerryBlooms moonscape

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Iran's 10-point plan for ending war calls for 'acceptance' of uranium enrichment, removing all US sanctions [View all] doublethink 21 hrs ago OP

If Iran had nuclear weapons it might not have been attacked. David__77 21 hrs ago #1

And Israel would cease to exist. pcdb 20 hrs ago #19

Like South Korea. David__77 20 hrs ago #21

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave 21 hrs ago #2

And Trump's? Kingofalldems 21 hrs ago #3

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave 21 hrs ago #5

Why would they ever agree to that fujiyamasan 21 hrs ago #9

The lesson in all that will be taken away is that having weapons to assure destruction will act as a shield. David__77 20 hrs ago #22

You're not an idiot..the only idiot is the one that tore up a hard fought for treaty that was verifiable and worked well Deuxcents 17 hrs ago #27

Exhibit A: Ukraine. BadgerKid 20 hrs ago #18

Exhibit B: Iraq fujiyamasan 20 hrs ago #20

Yeah well taco agreed to it in 'a concept of a plan' tonight .... doublethink 21 hrs ago #4

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave 21 hrs ago #6

Yep. n.t. doublethink 21 hrs ago #7

they're victims of unprovoked aggression mike_c 21 hrs ago #8

+1 leftstreet 21 hrs ago #10

Except attempting to manufacture nuclear weapons is not Disaffected 21 hrs ago #11

we had a treaty... mike_c 21 hrs ago #14

You are right - there was a treaty Disaffected 20 hrs ago #17

Seriously defending Trump? You know he's just being led by Bibi here fujiyamasan 20 hrs ago #23

Not defending Trump, simply saying his position Disaffected 17 hrs ago #25

Why just 7 countries ???? Whip-poor-will 13 hrs ago #29

"Us" and not "them" because Disaffected 7 hrs ago #30

How was this accepted? D_Master81 21 hrs ago #12

It is a serious plan. David__77 21 hrs ago #13

This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave 21 hrs ago #15

I dunno Trump took it as a starting point and is apparently trying to muzzle Israel. Facts on the ground... David__77 20 hrs ago #24

Big Bag of Money..Trump Can Grasp That Then WizumbODaSage 16 hrs ago #28

I guess he showed Obama. Norbert 20 hrs ago #16

Fun Times! 🎉 Iran gets a better Deal with TACO!!! Bread and Circuses 17 hrs ago #26