Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Disaffected

(6,444 posts)
6. Are you sure about the 1/3 of the "codes"?
Tue Apr 7, 2026, 03:48 PM
10 hrs ago

Gemini AI, FWIW, says (apologies for the missing formatting):

................

In the United States, the President has sole authority to order a nuclear launch. This means the President does not legally require the consent of the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, or Congress to authorize a strike.How the Process WorksAuthentication: To issue an order, the President must provide a unique authentication code, known as the Gold Codes, often carried on a plastic card nicknamed the "biscuit." This identifies the person as the Commander-in-Chief to the National Military Command Center (NMCC).The "Football": A military aide always accompanies the President with the Nuclear Football, a briefcase containing strike options and communication tools.No Veto: While the Secretary of Defense is required to verify that the order is authentic, they do not have the power to veto it.Potential Safeguards and ConstraintsWhile the authority is singular, the execution of the order is not. The system includes several practical and legal checks:The Two-Person Rule: Once a launch order is received at the operational level (such as a missile silo or submarine), two or more authorized individuals must independently verify the order and simultaneously turn keys or enter codes to execute it.Legal Obligation to Disobey: Under military law, service members are required to disobey "manifestly unlawful" orders. If an order to use nuclear weapons were deemed a violation of international humanitarian law or a war crime (e.g., targeting civilians without military necessity), commanders could theoretically refuse to carry it out.Recent Context: As of April 2026, there has been heightened public debate regarding this authority following escalating tensions with Iran and "Operation Epic Fury," leading some experts to call for reforms that would require additional certifications for a nuclear first strike.

..............

The above does not seem to support any 1/3 situation. Note especially the first two sentences.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Following the news with a...»Reply #6