Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

MayReasonRule

(4,101 posts)

8. Hmm...

Reply to Lovie777 (Reply #2)

Mon Apr 6, 2026, 01:43 PM

Monday

I would like to have a clear understanding of the underlying judicial principles that brought this decision about without comment or any noted dissents.

I do not have a clear understanding as to why.

My limited understanding is that it's strictly procedural, and that because it was the DOJ that brought the charges, the DOJ can request that they be vacated.

I do not conclude that the three known non-fascist justices desired for Bannon to be cleared.

Quite the opposite.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is SCOTUS trying to redeem itself? [View all] Aviation Pro Monday OP

No redemption is possible. Mister Ed Monday #1

Not with that Bannon decision...... Lovie777 Monday #2

Hmm... MayReasonRule Monday #8

No. usonian Monday #3

No Johnny2X2X Monday #4

It's far too late for that MustLoveBeagles Monday #5

Hell no. They will sit on this ruling until June bluestarone Monday #6

No SCOTUS redemption ever! DemocracyForever Monday #7