Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here's something that blew my mind - [View all]IronLionZion
(51,327 posts)42. The Apollo missions happened while the USA was deep into the Vietnam War
interesting parallels these days. I find Artemis much more interesting than the Iran war. This mission is to fly by the moon. NASA claims they plan to land people on it in 2028.
Artemis II's objectives are comparable to those of Apollo 8, the first crewed lunar mission of the Apollo program, in 1968. Unlike Apollo 8 and Apollo 10 in 1969, which orbited the Moon without landing, Artemis II will not enter lunar orbit.[95] Instead, Artemis II will fly around the Moon on a free-return trajectory, like Apollo 13 in 1970. While Apollo 13 came to 158 miles (254 km) above the lunar surface, Artemis II's closest approach will be ~4,700 miles (7,600 km).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_II
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artemis_II
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This government isn't interested in promoting that kind of success story -- a diverse crew working on science for
WhiskeyGrinder
Apr 1
#1
That's A BINGO! NASA Is Lucky Trump Probably Didn't Know, Either! "DEI! STOP! DEI!"
ColoringFool
Apr 1
#35
I'm old enough to remember when we had an admin who did promote/celebrate that kind of success...
PunkinPi
Thursday
#49
They're probably more concerned about where they're going to get money to eat
littlemissmartypants
Apr 1
#15
I'm embarrassed to say I only heard about it today! It sure wasn't promoted much buy the govt or the media!
LymphocyteLover
Apr 1
#19
I saw the dweeby blapping TV head talking with a NASA scientist; he said the moon was 250 million miles from Earth.
NBachers
Apr 1
#22
You do understand why I wouldn't listen to a reporter who claims the moon is 250,000,000 miles from Earth, don't you?
NBachers
Thursday
#53
My mom worked at NASA when I was a young girl and she would get positively emotional...
Trueblue Texan
Apr 1
#45
Part of it is that Trmp was trying so hard to fuck over NASA and every other science program that people just didn't
eppur_se_muova
Apr 1
#46
I'll bet their social feeds regularly contain conspiracy theories about the US faking the original 1969 landing
Ponietz
Thursday
#51
At this point in history, in my view, we really can't afford space entertainment.
NNadir
Thursday
#52
While I respect your opinion, we need to channel our scientific resourses more wisely.
NNadir
Thursday
#59
Kids in your classes grew up with Star Trek and Star Wars movies, plus a lot of other SciFi
FakeNoose
Thursday
#61
I was draft bait when Apollo 11 landed on the Moon and It was on my peripheral.
JohnnyRingo
Thursday
#62
I certainly appreciate robotics, but we still need the Human Experience. We are often explorers.
electric_blue68
Thursday
#68
Have always supported a robust space program, but I have some sympathy for the lack of interest right now in Artemis.
Martin68
Thursday
#80
Could it be a lack of curiosity in kids these days? Due to so much info being thrown in their faces everyday? nt
Exp
Thursday
#93