Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Pisces

(6,256 posts)
80. This is an attorney tactic to try and get his client off. There is video of him on the roof and jumping from
Tue Mar 31, 2026, 10:23 PM
Mar 31

the roof.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I thought this was fishy from the start. n/t rzemanfl Mar 30 #1
Defense lawyer claims client is innocent EdmondDantes_ Mar 30 #2
Is there a grassy knoll around somewhere? Ocelot II Mar 30 #3
Patsy dweller Mar 30 #4
This was a professional hit...................... Lovie777 Mar 30 #5
Yup, it certainly was blue-wave Mar 30 #29
This is your brain on conspiracy theories. nt BootinUp Mar 30 #6
Thank you ! stopdiggin Mar 30 #11
People still don't believe the Warren commission even after the shooting BootinUp Mar 30 #13
there is no end to the lunacy that the 'conspiracy brain' will gobble up .... - - - - -(nt)- stopdiggin Mar 30 #18
So by saying "lunacy" blue-wave Mar 31 #59
When I see evidence..... SergeStorms Mar 31 #62
this lab 'finding' does NOT say that the bullet did not come from the indicated gun stopdiggin Mar 31 #72
Gaslighting me doesn't help your case blue-wave Wednesday #82
The guy admitted to multiple people he did it EdmondDantes_ Wednesday #86
point being, I do not have to MAKE any sort of case at ALL. That has been more than abundantly stopdiggin Wednesday #87
Numerous people in the operating at the hospital saw that the back of Kennedy's head was blown off. everyonematters Mar 30 #27
you could see after he was shot Jackie trying to climb out the back of the convertible, as if chasing his head. Trueblue Texan Mar 31 #43
So we are supposed believe that blue-wave Mar 31 #58
. BootinUp Mar 31 #63
I guess the doctors in the hospital blue-wave Wednesday #83
You just can't let go of myths. Nt BootinUp Wednesday #84
You certainly can't, can you? blue-wave Wednesday #85
The facts are that the House assassinations Committe found there was a conspiracy. Rafi Mar 31 #76
Based on a faulty analysis of the audio. Throw that 2nd finding in the trash. nt BootinUp Mar 31 #78
Oh Lawd, there's a budding cottage industry of conspiracy theories on the RW alone. underpants Mar 30 #21
I WISH somebody ELSE had had a 'good rifle'---- Jack Valentino Mar 30 #41
Like the tRump fake assasination attempt that went wrong I have no doubt. nt yaesu Mar 30 #7
a very neat trick - given that the shooter TOLD other people that he did it stopdiggin Mar 30 #8
Why did they pin the murder Blue_Roses Mar 30 #9
He - a) confessed to roommate - b) stashed a rifle easily identified as belonging to him/family in nearby bushes stopdiggin Mar 30 #16
Weird Blue_Roses Mar 30 #20
Post removed Post removed Mar 31 #47
Oh boy... RockRaven Mar 30 #10
When ATF or some other forensic lab can't definitely match a bullet, they say so Prairie Gates Mar 30 #12
Exactly right. Straw Man Mar 30 #15
I did notice that the defense didn't say that the ATF dgauss Mar 30 #17
I haven't followed the story much rpannier Mar 30 #30
And so gentle readers, another conspiracy is born . . . Aussie105 Mar 30 #35
Nope. Not a rabbit hole I'm going doen. Not for this guy. OAITW r.2.0 Mar 30 #14
Hard to tell whether the defense is saying the bullet doesn't match the caliber of the rifle, or if it's pushing what WhiskeyGrinder Mar 30 #19
One of the many "marks matching" forensic "sciences" that is of dubious reliability Prairie Gates Mar 30 #23
Yep. Bite ID, blood spatter, fingerprints...whatever it takes to keep the PIC running. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 30 #25
Fire/burn/accelerant marks. Polygraphs. RockRaven Mar 30 #26
Carpet and fabric fibers Johnny2X2X Mar 30 #33
"Tool marks" and other nonsense pseudoscience Prairie Gates Mar 31 #52
I believe the lawyer is purposely being deceptive Bluetus Mar 31 #77
It's a defense claim Renew Deal Mar 30 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Mar 30 #24
My guess is that the bullet hit something hard after passing thru Kirk's neck NickB79 Mar 30 #28
The story says "... the bullet recovered at autopsy..." Mariana Mar 31 #68
Wherever it was recovered, it wasn't anywhere in his body NickB79 Mar 31 #81
The only evidence we should care about are vague engravings on bullets IronLionZion Mar 30 #31
Trump wanted this to be federal case. Wonder why? 33taw Mar 30 #32
Wow. More questions than answers. Joinfortmill Mar 30 #34
What questions? Aussie105 Mar 30 #36
Amazing deduction. Joinfortmill Mar 31 #50
How do we know he is dead? sarisataka Mar 30 #37
Crazy theories? Let's go! Danascot Mar 31 #49
Depends, is my next option to almost make out with JD Vance? EdmondDantes_ Mar 31 #69
If you saw the video before it was taken down, NH Ethylene Mar 31 #70
I did see it and personally have no doubts sarisataka Mar 31 #73
COLOR. ME. SHOCKED. MrChuck Mar 30 #38
My theory that Erika had something to do with it still stands. Initech Mar 31 #56
Probably means bullet was too damaged to be able to match it to the rifle Kaleva Mar 30 #39
A nice, sensible response to this new evidence. Ilikepurple Mar 31 #44
Good! Unrepentant Fenian Mar 30 #40
Shocking. C Moon Mar 30 #42
is there a link to the court filing? onenote Mar 31 #45
I've been looking, and everything points back to the DailyMail. usonian Mar 31 #46
Below is a link to CBS news Quiet Em Mar 31 #48
Lawyer being a lawyer Johnny2X2X Mar 31 #51
It was a fragment Historic NY Mar 31 #53
Ahhh, cooler heads BaronChocula Mar 31 #60
That's a rough row to hoe given that the suspect confessed the murder to allegorical oracle Mar 31 #54
Uh oh, this is going to disrupt Fox News' narrative. Initech Mar 31 #55
It was an inside job. idahoblue Mar 31 #57
I actually hope it doesn't match. Iggo Mar 31 #61
Hindustan Times seems to be a go-to for planted narratives lostnfound Mar 31 #64
I'd pull the OP in an instant if someone refuted it, but none so far. usonian Mar 31 #65
The body of the article itself refutes the title of the OP Kaleva Mar 31 #71
With Ca$h, Blondi and Juice Box Jeanine involved Hassler Mar 31 #66
I wouldn't put it past them to have set up the Trump ear shot, and the Kirk one LiberalLovinLug Mar 31 #67
So does this mean Charlie Kirk was not killed -- or does it mean he was only an AI deep fake who never existed? struggle4progress Mar 31 #74
My money's on two strong candidates. usonian Mar 31 #75
That is a reassuring thought! struggle4progress Mar 31 #79
This is an attorney tactic to try and get his client off. There is video of him on the roof and jumping from Pisces Mar 31 #80
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bullet used to kill Charl...»Reply #80