Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EdmondDantes_

(1,828 posts)
69. Depends, is my next option to almost make out with JD Vance?
Tue Mar 31, 2026, 05:26 PM
Mar 31

Because that's not an improvement in my circumstances.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I thought this was fishy from the start. n/t rzemanfl Mar 30 #1
Defense lawyer claims client is innocent EdmondDantes_ Mar 30 #2
Is there a grassy knoll around somewhere? Ocelot II Mar 30 #3
Patsy dweller Mar 30 #4
This was a professional hit...................... Lovie777 Mar 30 #5
Yup, it certainly was blue-wave Mar 30 #29
This is your brain on conspiracy theories. nt BootinUp Mar 30 #6
Thank you ! stopdiggin Mar 30 #11
People still don't believe the Warren commission even after the shooting BootinUp Mar 30 #13
there is no end to the lunacy that the 'conspiracy brain' will gobble up .... - - - - -(nt)- stopdiggin Mar 30 #18
So by saying "lunacy" blue-wave Mar 31 #59
When I see evidence..... SergeStorms Mar 31 #62
this lab 'finding' does NOT say that the bullet did not come from the indicated gun stopdiggin Mar 31 #72
Gaslighting me doesn't help your case blue-wave Wednesday #82
The guy admitted to multiple people he did it EdmondDantes_ Wednesday #86
point being, I do not have to MAKE any sort of case at ALL. That has been more than abundantly stopdiggin Wednesday #87
Numerous people in the operating at the hospital saw that the back of Kennedy's head was blown off. everyonematters Mar 30 #27
you could see after he was shot Jackie trying to climb out the back of the convertible, as if chasing his head. Trueblue Texan Mar 31 #43
So we are supposed believe that blue-wave Mar 31 #58
. BootinUp Mar 31 #63
I guess the doctors in the hospital blue-wave Wednesday #83
You just can't let go of myths. Nt BootinUp Wednesday #84
You certainly can't, can you? blue-wave Wednesday #85
The facts are that the House assassinations Committe found there was a conspiracy. Rafi Mar 31 #76
Based on a faulty analysis of the audio. Throw that 2nd finding in the trash. nt BootinUp Mar 31 #78
Oh Lawd, there's a budding cottage industry of conspiracy theories on the RW alone. underpants Mar 30 #21
I WISH somebody ELSE had had a 'good rifle'---- Jack Valentino Mar 30 #41
Like the tRump fake assasination attempt that went wrong I have no doubt. nt yaesu Mar 30 #7
a very neat trick - given that the shooter TOLD other people that he did it stopdiggin Mar 30 #8
Why did they pin the murder Blue_Roses Mar 30 #9
He - a) confessed to roommate - b) stashed a rifle easily identified as belonging to him/family in nearby bushes stopdiggin Mar 30 #16
Weird Blue_Roses Mar 30 #20
Post removed Post removed Mar 31 #47
Oh boy... RockRaven Mar 30 #10
When ATF or some other forensic lab can't definitely match a bullet, they say so Prairie Gates Mar 30 #12
Exactly right. Straw Man Mar 30 #15
I did notice that the defense didn't say that the ATF dgauss Mar 30 #17
I haven't followed the story much rpannier Mar 30 #30
And so gentle readers, another conspiracy is born . . . Aussie105 Mar 30 #35
Nope. Not a rabbit hole I'm going doen. Not for this guy. OAITW r.2.0 Mar 30 #14
Hard to tell whether the defense is saying the bullet doesn't match the caliber of the rifle, or if it's pushing what WhiskeyGrinder Mar 30 #19
One of the many "marks matching" forensic "sciences" that is of dubious reliability Prairie Gates Mar 30 #23
Yep. Bite ID, blood spatter, fingerprints...whatever it takes to keep the PIC running. WhiskeyGrinder Mar 30 #25
Fire/burn/accelerant marks. Polygraphs. RockRaven Mar 30 #26
Carpet and fabric fibers Johnny2X2X Mar 30 #33
"Tool marks" and other nonsense pseudoscience Prairie Gates Mar 31 #52
I believe the lawyer is purposely being deceptive Bluetus Mar 31 #77
It's a defense claim Renew Deal Mar 30 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Mar 30 #24
My guess is that the bullet hit something hard after passing thru Kirk's neck NickB79 Mar 30 #28
The story says "... the bullet recovered at autopsy..." Mariana Mar 31 #68
Wherever it was recovered, it wasn't anywhere in his body NickB79 Mar 31 #81
The only evidence we should care about are vague engravings on bullets IronLionZion Mar 30 #31
Trump wanted this to be federal case. Wonder why? 33taw Mar 30 #32
Wow. More questions than answers. Joinfortmill Mar 30 #34
What questions? Aussie105 Mar 30 #36
Amazing deduction. Joinfortmill Mar 31 #50
How do we know he is dead? sarisataka Mar 30 #37
Crazy theories? Let's go! Danascot Mar 31 #49
Depends, is my next option to almost make out with JD Vance? EdmondDantes_ Mar 31 #69
If you saw the video before it was taken down, NH Ethylene Mar 31 #70
I did see it and personally have no doubts sarisataka Mar 31 #73
COLOR. ME. SHOCKED. MrChuck Mar 30 #38
My theory that Erika had something to do with it still stands. Initech Mar 31 #56
Probably means bullet was too damaged to be able to match it to the rifle Kaleva Mar 30 #39
A nice, sensible response to this new evidence. Ilikepurple Mar 31 #44
Good! Unrepentant Fenian Mar 30 #40
Shocking. C Moon Mar 30 #42
is there a link to the court filing? onenote Mar 31 #45
I've been looking, and everything points back to the DailyMail. usonian Mar 31 #46
Below is a link to CBS news Quiet Em Mar 31 #48
Lawyer being a lawyer Johnny2X2X Mar 31 #51
It was a fragment Historic NY Mar 31 #53
Ahhh, cooler heads BaronChocula Mar 31 #60
That's a rough row to hoe given that the suspect confessed the murder to allegorical oracle Mar 31 #54
Uh oh, this is going to disrupt Fox News' narrative. Initech Mar 31 #55
It was an inside job. idahoblue Mar 31 #57
I actually hope it doesn't match. Iggo Mar 31 #61
Hindustan Times seems to be a go-to for planted narratives lostnfound Mar 31 #64
I'd pull the OP in an instant if someone refuted it, but none so far. usonian Mar 31 #65
The body of the article itself refutes the title of the OP Kaleva Mar 31 #71
With Ca$h, Blondi and Juice Box Jeanine involved Hassler Mar 31 #66
I wouldn't put it past them to have set up the Trump ear shot, and the Kirk one LiberalLovinLug Mar 31 #67
So does this mean Charlie Kirk was not killed -- or does it mean he was only an AI deep fake who never existed? struggle4progress Mar 31 #74
My money's on two strong candidates. usonian Mar 31 #75
That is a reassuring thought! struggle4progress Mar 31 #79
This is an attorney tactic to try and get his client off. There is video of him on the roof and jumping from Pisces Mar 31 #80
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bullet used to kill Charl...»Reply #69