Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(54,503 posts)
15. But they both did concur with the cons in this case.
Tue Mar 31, 2026, 01:16 PM
Mar 31
US Supreme Court strikes down Colorado law banning conversion therapy for gay, transgender minors

https://coloradosun.com/2026/03/31/conversion-therapy-supreme-court-ruling/

A Colorado law banning so-called conversion therapy to “cure” minors of being gay or transgender was struck down Tuesday by the U.S. Supreme Court, which determined that the law violates the First Amendment.

“Consider a hypothetical law that is the mirror image of Colorado’s. Instead of barring talk therapy designed to change a minor’s sexual orientation or gender identity, this law bars therapy affirming those things,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote in a concurring opinion. “Because the State has suppressed one side of a debate, while aiding the other, the constitutional issue is straightforward.”

Only one of the justices, Ketanji Brown Jackson, dissented. The court has a 6-3 conservative-majority. Justice Neil Gorsuch, formerly of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit based in Denver, wrote the majority opinion.

snip

During the October hearing, liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted that Colorado, six years since passing the law and three years since the legal challenge was filed, had not enforced it, and questioned whether the type of talk therapy Chiles provides would even be prohibited by the state ban. In response, Chiles’ attorney said Colorado was investigating anonymous allegations against Chiles’ practice. Sotomayor joined in Tuesday’s majority decision overturning the ban.

snip



https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/24-539_fd9g.pdf

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Its junk science, all of it. Johonny Mar 31 #1
Suicide the final outcome? yankee87 Mar 31 #3
We need to fire all of Rupert Murdoch's clowns at every level. Initech Mar 31 #2
Weird ruling. Free speech behind a closed door medical treatment. bucolic_frolic Mar 31 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Sympthsical Mar 31 #5
Was hate speech ever illegal? pcdb Mar 31 #12
There is not a "hate speech" exception to the First Amendment. tritsofme Apr 1 #28
It was pretty clear cut in this instance Sympthsical Mar 31 #6
The law protects abhorrent speech too EdmondDantes_ Mar 31 #7
Except they clearly don't believe that dsc Mar 31 #8
Perfect answer yankee87 Mar 31 #10
Sotomayor and Kagan didn't cocur with that decision Jose Garcia Mar 31 #13
No they didn't but Alito, Thomas, and Roberts surely did dsc Mar 31 #14
But they both did concur with the cons in this case. Celerity Mar 31 #15
Disagree yankee87 Mar 31 #11
There are a lot of terrible therapists in this world Sympthsical Mar 31 #19
Kagan touched on this in her concurrence Shrek Apr 1 #27
Therapy itself is questionable gulliver Mar 31 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Mar 31 #17
I've no doubt you've met more than your share n/t Torchlight Mar 31 #23
Questionable at its best. Cerulean Southpaw Mar 31 #18
There are good and bad therapists Sympthsical Mar 31 #20
Your point about the importance of social support... gulliver Mar 31 #24
Absolutely. Those are the bad ones. Sympthsical Apr 1 #26
In every profession there are the good and bad luv2fly Mar 31 #25
I Wonder if this will Pave the Way... NEOH Mar 31 #16
Sad, but true yankee87 Mar 31 #21
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court sides with Christian counselor over Colorado on 'conversion therapy' for minors LetMyPeopleVote Mar 31 #22
I am EXTREMELY disappointed that Justices Kagan and Sotomayor went along with this . . . markpkessinger Apr 1 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US Supreme Court rejects ...»Reply #15