Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kkmarie

(340 posts)
29. It won't be the doj procecuting
Wed Mar 25, 2026, 04:43 AM
9 hrs ago

The doj is just as corrupt as the rest of this regime.
However most states including NY and FL have their own laws and can prosecute for insider trading. I just can't determine where he claims his residence is.

And once this regime is out our new DOJ must prosecute every member of Congress who profitted from insider info.

Here are the key details regarding insider trading laws in Washington, D.C.:
Federal Authority: The SEC uses Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 to prosecute insider trading, prohibiting anyone (including government officials) from using nonpublic information for personal profit.

The STOCK Act (2012): This act prohibits members of Congress, their families, and staff from using nonpublic information gained through their work for insider trading. It also requires them to disclose stock trades within 30 to 45 days.

Proposed Strengthening Legislation (2025-2026): Because the STOCK Act penalties are low ($200 for late reporting), new legislation such as the Stop Insider Trading Act (introduced in Jan 2026) has been proposed to outright ban members from purchasing individual stocks, requiring them to sell or divest from their holdings.

Current Debate: While insider trading is officially illegal, there is significant ongoing political debate regarding its enforcement, with some lawmakers and activists pushing for stricter bans (e.g., the ETHICS Act) due to perceived loopholes.
Campaign Legal Center

In short, insider trading is illegal in D.C., and members of Congress are specifically restricted by the STOCK Act, with proposed legislation aiming to further restrict their ability to trade stocks. Representative Tom Barrett | (.gov)


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rule of law is for malaise Yesterday #1
just like taxes. Kid Berwyn Yesterday #3
"Rules are for thee, not for me" NCDem47 Yesterday #4
The entire system is effed up beyond belief malaise Yesterday #7
To be honest, I am not sure why we are waiting for them. OldBaldy1701E 19 hrs ago #23
"I wouldn't trust [Donald Trump] if his tongue was notarized". -- Leona Helmsley TearsOfDaClowned 8 hrs ago #30
K&R UTUSN Yesterday #2
This is the biggest crime spree in American history. yellow dahlia Yesterday #5
I doubt it malaise Yesterday #8
Good point. I stand corrected. yellow dahlia Yesterday #9
And they all called some gawd's name malaise Yesterday #12
That skip Easter vacation and legislate against our citizens in the name of Jebus comment - 25th A now! yellow dahlia 23 hrs ago #15
And yet most of the corporate media barely touched it malaise 22 hrs ago #17
What would Jesus do? yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #20
Don't rule out a Good Friday attack malaise 20 hrs ago #21
It's true. yellow dahlia 19 hrs ago #22
25th Amendment COL Mustard 7 hrs ago #31
And it is indeed why they were chosen. yellow dahlia 3 hrs ago #32
This is fucking insanity. This garbage should be illegal. Initech Yesterday #6
I worked with with investments and the SEC would look at every trade I made for myself. kerry-is-my-prez Yesterday #10
And if it was made via internet, it should be traceable with IP, right? Initech 23 hrs ago #16
The fox.... SergeStorms Yesterday #11
That family is a crime syndicate robbing this country blind. nt allegorical oracle Yesterday #13
Not his first rodeo... jmbar2 23 hrs ago #14
Volume in stock and oil futures surged minutes before Trump's market-turning post LetMyPeopleVote 21 hrs ago #18
Mind blowing is right. 🤯 ShazzieB 20 hrs ago #19
Lock them up, FGS Evolve Dammit 19 hrs ago #24
corrupt trading maliaSmith 17 hrs ago #25
Someone may have engaged in insider trading LetMyPeopleVote 16 hrs ago #26
Why is no one LilElf70 14 hrs ago #27
At least we finally know the reason for thomski64 12 hrs ago #28
It won't be the doj procecuting kkmarie 9 hrs ago #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maybe it was Barron's fir...»Reply #29