Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Heather Cox Richardson: '...there's big news--I mean, aside from all the other big news...' [View all]harumph
(3,242 posts)35. I think that's probably true. But my problem is that despite the investigation getting killed,
In 2020 Garland would have at least known about it. So, why didn't the Biden DOJ revive it? They knew Trump was dirty and
even knew of Trump involvement with Epstein. I'm not pointing a finger at Biden because he from all appearances
was a hands off the DOJ kind of president. But seriously, nobody can tell me that Garland wasn't aware of the seriousness
of this past investigation. It didn't give him pause? The more I learn about the timeline, the less I trust him. We have enough
problems with republicans in general to have to worry about disingenuous appointees by democratic administrations.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Heather Cox Richardson: '...there's big news--I mean, aside from all the other big news...' [View all]
Joinfortmill
Yesterday
OP
I'd go back to St. Ronald Raygun and his fast-tracking citizenship for Rupert Murdoch
OMGWTF
Yesterday
#22
When Garland came in the decisions had already been made to shut it all down
FakeNoose
Yesterday
#24
Sorry, but I don't find it a plausible argument that Garland was not even aware of such an important investigation
harumph
Yesterday
#27
Remember Obama nominated Garland instead of a young progressive in order to embarrass the Republicans.
Marcuse
21 hrs ago
#48
I think that's probably true. But my problem is that despite the investigation getting killed,
harumph
Yesterday
#35