Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

erronis

(23,705 posts)

1. The general danced well until Vindman's time expired.

Reply to Uncle Joe (Original post)

Tue Mar 17, 2026, 06:27 PM

Tuesday

Q: Has an order been issued to you on "No Quarter, No Survivors"?

A: No

Q: And would you consider such an order lawful?

A: blather, blather, blather

Q: repeated

A: Congressman, I would not follow an unlawful order.

Vindman: That's an unlawful order.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

7 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Uncle Joe kcoates ActRaiser PatSeg Golfnbrew byronius wolfie001

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'Would You Consider Such An Order Lawful?': Vindman Grills Pentagon Officials On Hegseth Comments [View all] Uncle Joe Tuesday OP

The general danced well until Vindman's time expired. erronis Tuesday #1

Meh malaise Tuesday #2

MS NOW- The dangerous significance of Pete Hegseth's 'no quarter' Iran war pledge LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #3

Hegseth is blood thirsty and thinks machismo makes him manly BlueWaveNeverEnd Tuesday #5

Everyone knows Hegseth mean "no quarter" figuratively, not literally. maxsolomon Tuesday #4

Cue Colin Jost! BidenRocks Tuesday #6

I would pay per view Hegseth's court ordered war crimes hanging. aeromanKC Tuesday #7

I'm noticing over and over some_of_us_are_sane Tuesday #8