Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(9,843 posts)
2. Why are you linking to an old BS thread?
Mon Mar 16, 2026, 03:13 PM
Yesterday

It is not now nor was it ever remotely true that Harris received 0 votes in a NY county like the Title of the thread you linked to claaimed.

Also, there's no question that suppression cost Harris votes. But there is no evidence for such a precise number as Palast claims. And of course, even if she ended up with 20 million more votes than Trump, it would all be irrelevant if she didn't have enough to win in enough states to win the electoral vote. So the idea that she would have topped Trump's total by 1.2 million votes is totally irrellevant. Hillary Clinton got almost 3 million more votes than Trump but she didn't win so who cares how many more votes Harris could have gotten than Trump. Palast is simply a grifter trying to take advantage of the gullible.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Greg Palast reposted on X»Reply #2