Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

stopdiggin

(15,371 posts)

20. the only person you have any sort of (legitimate) grievance with

Reply to NJCher (Reply #17)

Sun Mar 15, 2026, 11:20 PM

Sunday

is the person that has made some sort of 'commitment' toward you. Any other(s) - are purely tangential to either that commitment, the relationship, living condition - or any damages done therein.

The idea of someone coming along and 'poaching' on your innocent and unsullied territory ... Is pure fantasy and at base fictional legerdemain. Sorry - but I cannot agree with even the basic tenets or proposition regarding argument for, as you would put it, "interference". Your partner is the one who strayed. Full stop.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

rictofen

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kyrsten Sinema getting exactly what she deserves - one of the tawdriest lawsuits possible... [View all] PeaceWave Sunday OP

Amusing ... And, still - the whole 'alienation of ..' schtick is so ludicrous and hopelessly antiquated ... stopdiggin Sunday #1

Yea it has roots in the idea that your spouse is your property, women being the property of their husbands... FascismIsDeath Sunday #2

And yet, 2 of the 6 states that still have this law on the books are Democratic... PeaceWave Sunday #3

and again - the idea of a 'home wrecker' - let alone the notion that it is something stopdiggin Sunday #12

It is not a criminal charge bottomofthehill Yesterday #29

precisely ! You think I should be able to sue for 'alimony' against third part actors? stopdiggin Yesterday #31

Those states being Democratic doesn't shield them from the valid criticism that they are ass backwards.... FascismIsDeath Sunday #15

Unfortunately principle can go out the window when it's a "bad" person EdmondDantes_ Sunday #21

Hey if some ho like sinema NJCher Sunday #5

Agreed PJMcK Sunday #7

the idea of 'cheating' as criminal offense, or actionable behavior ..... stopdiggin Sunday #13

I don't even believe in marriage NJCher Sunday #17

the only person you have any sort of (legitimate) grievance with stopdiggin Sunday #20

Men are easy targets NJCher Sunday #22

The responsibility lies with your partner. FascismIsDeath Sunday #14

Damages exist NJCher Sunday #18

There ALREADY is recourse. Its called a divorce settlement. FascismIsDeath Sunday #19

you won't understand this NJCher Sunday #23

You're right, I'm not superstitious, so I have not "understanding" of that. FascismIsDeath Yesterday #24

Well, that's amusing NJCher Yesterday #25

I agree that it shouldn't exist, but it does. LisaL Sunday #11

Seems valid to me if you agree that states shouldn't be able to enforce their laws on people in other states. FascismIsDeath Sunday #16

Looking more into this, LisaL Yesterday #27

I feel the same way jfz9580m Sunday #4

it is indeed fucking ridiculous Skittles Yesterday #28

That Senate Cloakroom must be one swingin' place. nt Buns_of_Fire Sunday #6

That and the theater 😉 SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #9

I love this for her. SunSeeker Sunday #8

She spent a lot of time screwing around, literally miyazaki Sunday #10

A scorned party may want their pound of flesh Keepthesoulalive Yesterday #26

No sympathy for Sinema but "homewrecker" lawsuits are stupid. yellowcanine Yesterday #30