Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: They Didn't Want to Have C-Sections. A Judge Would Decide How They Gave Birth. [View all]Quiet Em
(2,871 posts)25. Women of reproductive age need to get the hell out of Florida. This is absurd.
The only patient in that room is the pregnant woman and the only people who should be discussing a C-Section are the pregnant woman and her doctor.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They Didn't Want to Have C-Sections. A Judge Would Decide How They Gave Birth. [View all]
WhiskeyGrinder
19 hrs ago
OP
Wow. That is appalling. The child is more important than the woman, no matter what.
Biophilic
19 hrs ago
#2
What's extreme about this situation is forcing someone who's in active labor into a court hearing to establish legally
WhiskeyGrinder
18 hrs ago
#5
People make medical decisions that result in their own deaths all the time.
WhiskeyGrinder
18 hrs ago
#7
Exhibit A: all those Jehovah's Witnesses who refuse blood transfusions for themselves OR their children.
ShazzieB
11 hrs ago
#39
The pregnant woman's profession was assisting women to deliver safely....got it?
Hope22
18 hrs ago
#9
Exactly what part of viable, at term, and in fetal distress do you not fucking understand?
paleotn
12 hrs ago
#38
And? An obstetrics team is going to go to all that trouble unless it's for a good reason?
paleotn
8 hrs ago
#57
The woman stated she had already had a life threatening complication from a C Section.
Hope22
5 hrs ago
#61
Yes, I'm willing to sacrifice the lives of some full term fetuses to protect women's rights to bodily autonomy.
Crunchy Frog
2 hrs ago
#66
It was the woman's profession, but in her own case she was not making the safest decision
karynnj
10 hrs ago
#44
If ONLY the decision was based on the health and welfare of the mother... the existing
slightlv
10 hrs ago
#45
I worked in that field. When you're in the hospital, you don't have a choice.
LeftInTX
17 hrs ago
#20
It's not as rare as people think, and it doesn't matter if someone thinks it's "safest".
Crunchy Frog
2 hrs ago
#65
It's not just Florida. In almost 30 states, hospitals can override the advance directives of pregnant people.
WhiskeyGrinder
17 hrs ago
#14
Eh, men do give birth and it still is a thing, but likely because of the discrimination trans men face.
WhiskeyGrinder
17 hrs ago
#13
Beyond appalling. Mother first, unless both can be saved & the mother's wishes unclear (& she is
hlthe2b
17 hrs ago
#16
Women of reproductive age need to get the hell out of Florida. This is absurd.
Quiet Em
16 hrs ago
#25
If it's an emergency C-Sect, fetal distress, certain maternal conditions, unknown fetal conditions etc.
LeftInTX
15 hrs ago
#28
Glad I posted this thread. It's good to get a reminder about just how easily so many people are willing to sign away
WhiskeyGrinder
10 hrs ago
#41
This is absolutely disgusting. Under no circumstances should women ever be robbed of the right to
Crunchy Frog
2 hrs ago
#64
Interesting to see how much anti-choice sentiment there really is here on DU. Article and the responses
Crunchy Frog
1 hr ago
#69