They Didn't Want to Have C-Sections. A Judge Would Decide How They Gave Birth. [View all]
They Didnt Want to Have C-Sections. A Judge Would Decide How They Gave Birth.
by Amy Yurkanin, ProPublica, with photography by Sarahbeth Maney for ProPublica
March 14, 2026, 5:00 am
Unequal Rights: Pregnant women in some states have fewer rights than other mentally competent adults to refuse medical treatment, including surgery.
Constitutional Questions: The rise of fetal personhood policies has some legal experts worried about an increase in court-ordered medical care.
Florida Disparities: Florida has gone further than other states to guarantee medical freedom for those who decline vaccines, but it also has restricted the medical freedom of pregnant women.
These highlights were written by the reporters and editors who worked on this story.
On the afternoon of Sept. 9, 2024, Cherise Doyley was in her 12th hour of contractions at University of Florida Health in downtown Jacksonville when a nurse came in with a bedsheet and told her to cover up.
A supervisor brought a tablet to Doyleys bedside. Gathered on the screen were a judge in a black robe and several lawyers, doctors and hospital staff.
snip//
The hospital and state attorneys office wanted to force Doyley to undergo a cesarean section. Doyley, a professional birthing doula, didnt want that and had been firm about it. Shed had three prior C-sections, one that resulted in a hemorrhage, and hoped to avoid another serious complication and lengthy recovery. She was aware that doctors were concerned about the risk of uterine rupture, a potentially deadly complication for her and her baby.
She would say during the hearing that she understood the risk to be less than 2% and didnt want to agree to a C-section unless there was an emergency.
But
the choice would not be hers. The judge would decide how she would give birth.
more...
https://www.propublica.org/article/florida-court-ordered-c-sections