Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why my head hurts: This exchange just happened Thursday on the Senate floor. [View all]Squaredeal
(720 posts)4. It would disenfranchise married women the most.
Those who took the name of their husband, since it doesnt match their birth certificate. Presentation of a valid marriage certificate, even if one is divorced but kept the exs last name, I assume, would be required to help prove citizenship.
Would presentation of adoption records be required to prove citizenship for those individuals who had a different name at birth, even in cases where birth records are sealed by a court?
There seems to be a lot of unanswered questions about the bill, not including the Constitutional challenge that elections are a state, not a federal right.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
28 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):Lonestarblue10 Turtle Dayraging moderateDixcms libertyLymphocyteLoverFerrets are CoolMultichromaticanandaCaptainTruthoasisbluestaronekcoateswhathehellRockCreekdiane in sfLaRavenjustsomeguy01skideemonAttilatheblondwave_makerIbogaProjectLittleGirlpazzyanneButterflieslove_katzSeinan SenseiMrsCheaplaugh
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why my head hurts: This exchange just happened Thursday on the Senate floor. [View all]
634-5789
Friday
OP
I have read news reports that say a marriage certificate won't be accepted as ID in the event of a divorce.
love_katz
Friday
#50
Spot on! Since more than a couple GOP pols and influencers suggested women should not be able to vote
Attilatheblond
Friday
#34
This bill is clearly intended to disenfranchise women and minorities since fewer of them vote for Republicans.
Lonestarblue
Friday
#6
Mine too a bit longer. I had to get a new birth certificate. The old ones did not name your parents like the new ones.
twodogsbarking
Friday
#19
i prepared and got a fresh new copy, only to be told the old one was actually better!
uncle ray
Friday
#30
Sounds like the rural midwest, where I live now! Bro and I live within 20 minutes of our hometown.
slightlv
Friday
#47
From what I have read, this bill will disenfrancise both republicans and Democrats.
patphil
Friday
#22
Voting should be mandatory. $40 lazy tax going to the inside the beltway constitutional officer yacht club
Gum Logger
Friday
#40
..and GOP is already reducing avenues for obtaining passports..ending allowing libraries to assist
BlueWaveNeverEnd
Friday
#44