Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It is not an act of loyalty to quash conversations about our own party's role in getting to where we are today. [View all]leftstreet
(39,718 posts)103. +1
I'm looking forward to the up coming primaries. We are going to find out who can get the job done and who can't. We are going to find out who the people want rather than who the old guard wants.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
246 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is not an act of loyalty to quash conversations about our own party's role in getting to where we are today. [View all]
Scrivener7
Tuesday
OP
Sorry, it's not the Democratic Party. It's Republican voters, third party voters, and petulant nonvoters
lapucelle
Tuesday
#3
And maga-pub IS NOT a political party---- it is a criminal domestic terrorist organization
Jack Valentino
Tuesday
#207
I think we here all work hard to elect Democrats. And we have been doing so for years. And yet, here we are.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#48
Work harder to shut down opposition narratives, most especially those from purists and punishers
lapucelle
Tuesday
#52
Which, by definition, has nothing to do with shutting down discussions on DU.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#53
To begin with, expressing an opinion on a topic is not "shutting down discussion" on a topic.
lapucelle
Tuesday
#66
Even given the definitional problems (and notwithstanding the random use of latin),
lapucelle
Tuesday
#127
Recognizing a Latin word and saying your conclusion doesn't follow from your premises is not an argument either
Ilikepurple
Tuesday
#198
Creating your own three term argument by merging two distinct and seperate terms into one
lapucelle
Yesterday
#221
You said even given the definitional problems, there conclusion does not follow
Ilikepurple
19 hrs ago
#236
You merged two terms into one in an attempt to create a syllogism where none exists.
lapucelle
18 hrs ago
#239
I agree with you 100% Scrivener7. It is not a fluke that we are in this mess.
flashman13
Tuesday
#71
I'm really looking forward to the primaries too. We have an incredible bench, and
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#73
It's the Democratic Party which nominates candidates which voters either accept or reject
Jose Garcia
Tuesday
#154
With the (somewhat) arguable exception of 2024, voters choose the candidates.
lapucelle
Tuesday
#165
Same here. And I'm highly suspect of the motives of anyone demanding we do otherwise.
FoxNewsSucks
Tuesday
#67
Yep. And that's the problem. This has nothing to do with criticizing Democrats. It has to do with looking at
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#8
I'm with you right up until the part about nominating a republican. But I get your point.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#22
If we don't look at the issues of the Dem structure, and question it, then we are in a cult...
yellow dahlia
Tuesday
#81
"I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever
Ping Tung
Tuesday
#11
"I am a Christian and a Democrat. That's all": FDR, when asked to define his political philosophy.
lapucelle
Tuesday
#21
Yes, folks choose to vote for Republicans or third-party candidates or to withhold any vote as punishment
lapucelle
Tuesday
#120
Just as there's nothing wrong calling out the politicians who support or vote for
Ping Tung
Tuesday
#143
I'm not talking about ripping on Dems and I'm not talking about anything that violates the TOS.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#13
Fire the strategists and consultant class, The party needs to stop making the same mistakes.
yellow dahlia
Tuesday
#86
Any time we stop speaking truth, we benefit those who want to hide the truth.
hamsterjill
Tuesday
#14
Cheerleaders, the party is always right, swarm, posse, toe the line, echo chamber, blind loyalty, marching in lockstep,
betsuni
Tuesday
#17
Finding out facts instead of leaping to negative conclusions about Democrats is mocked as mindless loyalty. Projection.
betsuni
Tuesday
#164
We failed to read history, but it's only now that history is understood at all
bucolic_frolic
Tuesday
#18
So much yes to this! All those bad movies about evil conglomerates trying to rule the world?
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#29
My daughter quipped the other day - "Who knew the original Superman movie was a road map..."
harumph
Tuesday
#42
Trump 2.0 could have been prevented by closing the border and having a normal primary
dalton99a
Tuesday
#31
I think that's a perfect example because it's my opinion that, if Democratic leaders had not gotten so much
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#44
So a groundswell of constituent opinion has no effect on your elected officials?
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#134
Social media posts and constituent opinion are two very different things. N/T
lapucelle
Tuesday
#167
i completely agree with you. We should be able to speak freely if it is for constructive reason
samsingh
Tuesday
#51
So the lesson, which I hope we have learned, is that we release it all as soon as we are able.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#122
100% Agree, Scrivener 7. If we can't see our own part in something we can't improve...
johnnyplankton
Tuesday
#55
I do think the DNC is starting to realize that much of the grass roots is really pissed at the party leadership
Bluetus
Tuesday
#83
I think recent events have provided us with a pretty extensive list of things we
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#85
There was one in particular this morning that was a good example. I can't link to it. For reasons I will not state.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#107
Milquetoast, strongly worded letters, old guard, status quo, gerontocracy, Vichy Dems, Surrender Dems,
betsuni
Tuesday
#124
Good post Scrivener7, and a worthwhile question to ask. I feel the biggest mistake we may have made is to underestimate
c-rational
Tuesday
#101
What a great topic. Absent discussions like these, we Dems are merely REACTING to what the other side does.
PeaceWave
Tuesday
#106
It's not possible currently to discuss mistakes and we are doomed to repeat them again.
Melon
Tuesday
#152
This and your gatekeeping is the issue that prevents open discussion and improvement.
Melon
Tuesday
#177
It has nothing to do with being loyal. It's about fighting back against (often) unfair and unwarranted criticism.
W_HAMILTON
Tuesday
#153
I wasn't defending Garland (especially towards the end) nor was I backstabbing Hillary and Kamala.
W_HAMILTON
12 hrs ago
#241
I may be late to this discussion, but I read it early this morning and just now thought I would add my 2cents.
Ninga
Tuesday
#155
And they feel just as strongly as you do about their name calling being calling it as they see it
EdmondDantes_
Tuesday
#205
The key: 100% confidence one is 100% correct, obviously morally righteously correct.
betsuni
Yesterday
#212
The number of RECs, replies, and views to this OP shows just how important to the DU community...
Ol Janx Spirit
Tuesday
#197