Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It is not an act of loyalty to quash conversations about our own party's role in getting to where we are today. [View all]Scrivener7
(59,037 posts)50. And it seems like it took a little outrage to convince them of the fact.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
246 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is not an act of loyalty to quash conversations about our own party's role in getting to where we are today. [View all]
Scrivener7
Tuesday
OP
Sorry, it's not the Democratic Party. It's Republican voters, third party voters, and petulant nonvoters
lapucelle
Tuesday
#3
And maga-pub IS NOT a political party---- it is a criminal domestic terrorist organization
Jack Valentino
Tuesday
#207
I think we here all work hard to elect Democrats. And we have been doing so for years. And yet, here we are.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#48
Work harder to shut down opposition narratives, most especially those from purists and punishers
lapucelle
Tuesday
#52
Which, by definition, has nothing to do with shutting down discussions on DU.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#53
To begin with, expressing an opinion on a topic is not "shutting down discussion" on a topic.
lapucelle
Tuesday
#66
Even given the definitional problems (and notwithstanding the random use of latin),
lapucelle
Tuesday
#127
Recognizing a Latin word and saying your conclusion doesn't follow from your premises is not an argument either
Ilikepurple
Tuesday
#198
Creating your own three term argument by merging two distinct and seperate terms into one
lapucelle
Yesterday
#221
You said even given the definitional problems, there conclusion does not follow
Ilikepurple
Yesterday
#236
You merged two terms into one in an attempt to create a syllogism where none exists.
lapucelle
Yesterday
#239
I agree with you 100% Scrivener7. It is not a fluke that we are in this mess.
flashman13
Tuesday
#71
I'm really looking forward to the primaries too. We have an incredible bench, and
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#73
It's the Democratic Party which nominates candidates which voters either accept or reject
Jose Garcia
Tuesday
#154
With the (somewhat) arguable exception of 2024, voters choose the candidates.
lapucelle
Tuesday
#165
Same here. And I'm highly suspect of the motives of anyone demanding we do otherwise.
FoxNewsSucks
Tuesday
#67
Yep. And that's the problem. This has nothing to do with criticizing Democrats. It has to do with looking at
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#8
I'm with you right up until the part about nominating a republican. But I get your point.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#22
If we don't look at the issues of the Dem structure, and question it, then we are in a cult...
yellow dahlia
Tuesday
#81
"I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever
Ping Tung
Tuesday
#11
"I am a Christian and a Democrat. That's all": FDR, when asked to define his political philosophy.
lapucelle
Tuesday
#21
Yes, folks choose to vote for Republicans or third-party candidates or to withhold any vote as punishment
lapucelle
Tuesday
#120
Just as there's nothing wrong calling out the politicians who support or vote for
Ping Tung
Tuesday
#143
I'm not talking about ripping on Dems and I'm not talking about anything that violates the TOS.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#13
Fire the strategists and consultant class, The party needs to stop making the same mistakes.
yellow dahlia
Tuesday
#86
Any time we stop speaking truth, we benefit those who want to hide the truth.
hamsterjill
Tuesday
#14
Cheerleaders, the party is always right, swarm, posse, toe the line, echo chamber, blind loyalty, marching in lockstep,
betsuni
Tuesday
#17
Finding out facts instead of leaping to negative conclusions about Democrats is mocked as mindless loyalty. Projection.
betsuni
Tuesday
#164
We failed to read history, but it's only now that history is understood at all
bucolic_frolic
Tuesday
#18
So much yes to this! All those bad movies about evil conglomerates trying to rule the world?
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#29
My daughter quipped the other day - "Who knew the original Superman movie was a road map..."
harumph
Tuesday
#42
Trump 2.0 could have been prevented by closing the border and having a normal primary
dalton99a
Tuesday
#31
I think that's a perfect example because it's my opinion that, if Democratic leaders had not gotten so much
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#44
So a groundswell of constituent opinion has no effect on your elected officials?
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#134
Social media posts and constituent opinion are two very different things. N/T
lapucelle
Tuesday
#167
i completely agree with you. We should be able to speak freely if it is for constructive reason
samsingh
Tuesday
#51
So the lesson, which I hope we have learned, is that we release it all as soon as we are able.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#122
100% Agree, Scrivener 7. If we can't see our own part in something we can't improve...
johnnyplankton
Tuesday
#55
I do think the DNC is starting to realize that much of the grass roots is really pissed at the party leadership
Bluetus
Tuesday
#83
I think recent events have provided us with a pretty extensive list of things we
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#85
There was one in particular this morning that was a good example. I can't link to it. For reasons I will not state.
Scrivener7
Tuesday
#107
Milquetoast, strongly worded letters, old guard, status quo, gerontocracy, Vichy Dems, Surrender Dems,
betsuni
Tuesday
#124
Good post Scrivener7, and a worthwhile question to ask. I feel the biggest mistake we may have made is to underestimate
c-rational
Tuesday
#101
It's not possible currently to discuss mistakes and we are doomed to repeat them again.
Melon
Tuesday
#152
This and your gatekeeping is the issue that prevents open discussion and improvement.
Melon
Tuesday
#177
It has nothing to do with being loyal. It's about fighting back against (often) unfair and unwarranted criticism.
W_HAMILTON
Tuesday
#153
I wasn't defending Garland (especially towards the end) nor was I backstabbing Hillary and Kamala.
W_HAMILTON
17 hrs ago
#241
I may be late to this discussion, but I read it early this morning and just now thought I would add my 2cents.
Ninga
Tuesday
#155
And they feel just as strongly as you do about their name calling being calling it as they see it
EdmondDantes_
Tuesday
#205
The key: 100% confidence one is 100% correct, obviously morally righteously correct.
betsuni
Yesterday
#212
The number of RECs, replies, and views to this OP shows just how important to the DU community...
Ol Janx Spirit
Tuesday
#197