Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chris Hayes reporting that Grand Jury has refused to indict Mark Kelly and the [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(177,139 posts)33. Grand Jury Rebuffs Justice Dept. Attempt to Indict 6 Democrats in Congress (NYT Gift Subscription)
The rejection was a remarkable rebuke, suggesting that ordinary citizens did not believe that the lawmakers had committed any crimes.
Link to tweet
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/10/us/politics/trump-democrats-illegal-orders-pirro.html?unlocked_article_code=1.LVA.6CKn.AKtD2kERP9jk&smid=nytcore-ios-share
Federal prosecutors in Washington sought and failed on Tuesday to secure an indictment against six Democratic lawmakers who posted a video this fall that enraged President Trump by reminding active-duty members of the military and intelligence community that they were obligated to refuse illegal orders, four people familiar with the matter said.
It was remarkable that the U.S. attorneys office in Washington led by Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of Mr. Trumps authorized prosecutors to go into a grand jury and ask for an indictment of the six members of Congress, all of whom had served in the military or the nations spy agencies.
But it was even more remarkable that a group of ordinary citizens sitting on the grand jury in Federal District Court in Washington forcefully rejected Mr. Trumps bid to label their expression of dissent as a criminal act warranting prosecution.
The move to charge the lawmakers among them, Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona and Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan was, by any measure, an extraordinary attempt by Trump appointees to politicize the criminal justice system even for a Justice Department that has repeatedly shattered norms of independence from the White House and followed Mr. Trumps directives to prosecute his adversaries......
President Trump is using the F.B.I. as a tool to intimidate and harass members of Congress, the four House members who took part in the video said in a joint statement. No amount of intimidation or harassment will ever stop us from doing our jobs and honoring our Constitution.
Mr. Kelly is also facing a separate investigation by the Pentagon into what military officials described as serious allegations of misconduct.
It was remarkable that the U.S. attorneys office in Washington led by Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of Mr. Trumps authorized prosecutors to go into a grand jury and ask for an indictment of the six members of Congress, all of whom had served in the military or the nations spy agencies.
But it was even more remarkable that a group of ordinary citizens sitting on the grand jury in Federal District Court in Washington forcefully rejected Mr. Trumps bid to label their expression of dissent as a criminal act warranting prosecution.
The move to charge the lawmakers among them, Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona and Senator Elissa Slotkin of Michigan was, by any measure, an extraordinary attempt by Trump appointees to politicize the criminal justice system even for a Justice Department that has repeatedly shattered norms of independence from the White House and followed Mr. Trumps directives to prosecute his adversaries......
President Trump is using the F.B.I. as a tool to intimidate and harass members of Congress, the four House members who took part in the video said in a joint statement. No amount of intimidation or harassment will ever stop us from doing our jobs and honoring our Constitution.
Mr. Kelly is also facing a separate investigation by the Pentagon into what military officials described as serious allegations of misconduct.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Chris Hayes reporting that Grand Jury has refused to indict Mark Kelly and the [View all]
allegorical oracle
Tuesday
OP
It's just legal harassment! It usually costs money to defend against most charges---
Jack Valentino
Tuesday
#14
Trump administration fails to secure indictment in connection with Democrats involved in 'illegal orders' video
LetMyPeopleVote
Tuesday
#7
Well Duh! What "crime" were they supposed to have committed according to the DOJ?
Wiz Imp
Tuesday
#9
According to the NYT, "interfering with the loyalty, morale or discipline of the U.S. armed forces"
muriel_volestrangler
Wednesday
#30
Grand Jury Rebuffs Justice Dept. Attempt to Indict 6 Democrats in Congress (NYT Gift Subscription)
LetMyPeopleVote
Wednesday
#33
MaddowBlog-Dems enraged after Trump's DOJ targeted veterans with charges of seditious conspiracy
LetMyPeopleVote
Wednesday
#42
I expected this, given the fact that the Uniform Code of Military Justice states this quite clearly.
patphil
Wednesday
#43
No grand jurors found the Trump DOJ met low probable cause threshold in failed indictment of Democratic lawmakers
LetMyPeopleVote
Wednesday
#44
Deadline Legal Blog-Grand jury's refusal to indict Democrats joins a stunning pattern of DOJ rejections
LetMyPeopleVote
Yesterday
#45
