Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,198 posts)
7. Trump administration fails to secure indictment in connection with Democrats involved in 'illegal orders' video
Tue Feb 10, 2026, 08:47 PM
Tuesday

President Donald Trump had accused six Democratic lawmakers of "seditious behavior" after they urged members of the military and intelligence communities to refuse unlawful orders.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/doj-fails-secure-indictment-democrats-involved-illegal-orders-video-rcna258385

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration tried and failed on Tuesday to secure an indictment in connection with a video featuring six Democratic lawmakers urging members of the military and intelligence communities not to comply with unlawful orders, three sources familiar with the matter told NBC News.

It was not clear how many of the lawmakers the Trump administration attempted to indict, or if the failed attempt will be addressed in a future court hearing.

The indictment pursued by the office of U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro is the latest example of the Justice Department targeting the president’s perceived political opponents. The government attorneys assigned to the case are political appointees, not career Justice Department prosecutors, according to a source familiar with the investigation.....

In addition to the First Amendment issues, the “speech or debate" clause of the Constitution gives lawmakers on Capitol Hill immunity from prosecution for acts taken within the legislative sphere, a fundamental check on the constitutional separation of powers.

Several Democrats involved in the video recently said they would not cooperate with the Justice Department's probe into the video.

Under longstanding Justice Department policy, the Public Integrity Section would normally have to sign off on every step of an investigation into a sitting member of Congress, especially a case with free speech and speech and debate considerations. But the Trump administration has dismantled the Public Integrity Section, eliminating checks meant to prevent the Justice Department's powers from being abused for political purposes.

Recommendations

13 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Maybe now the monster will stop targeting his enemies? vapor2 Tuesday #1
It's just legal harassment! It usually costs money to defend against most charges--- Jack Valentino Tuesday #14
Never. SergeStorms Wednesday #39
Not really a surprise senseandsensibility Tuesday #2
Huge - KABOOM, malaise Tuesday #3
Illegal orders you mean. pwb Tuesday #4
This UTUSN Tuesday #23
They are not going to stop. johnnyfins Tuesday #5
Correct they will keep trying newdeal2 Tuesday #11
That's a relief MustLoveBeagles Tuesday #6
Trump administration fails to secure indictment in connection with Democrats involved in 'illegal orders' video LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #7
Pirro: brakester Wednesday #37
Ham sandwiches apparently have more criminal tendencies Ocelot II Tuesday #8
Well Duh! What "crime" were they supposed to have committed according to the DOJ? Wiz Imp Tuesday #9
According to the NYT, "interfering with the loyalty, morale or discipline of the U.S. armed forces" muriel_volestrangler Wednesday #30
That is great news! mysteryowl Tuesday #10
That's illegal orders not legal orders WmChris Tuesday #12
This UTUSN Tuesday #24
So Pirro decided to go ahead and make herself look like a drunk fool again mdbl Tuesday #13
She Was Born to the Role The Roux Comes First Tuesday #26
For a small period of time, it looked like she might try to rehab mdbl Wednesday #32
the J6 king himself, whining about "seditious behavior" Skittles Tuesday #15
Good on them canetoad Tuesday #16
Old "Drinky" Jeanine's batting average keeps dropping. LudwigPastorius Tuesday #17
Here's the video of Chris Hayes' announcement: Rhiannon12866 Tuesday #18
Now sue them for 20 Billion dollars! BidenRocks Tuesday #19
YES!!!!!! calimary Tuesday #20
Hooray! mahina Tuesday #21
OMG, we won ONE LilElf70 Tuesday #22
Can the grand jury transcripts be made public? Tasmanian Devil Tuesday #25
Mark Kelly is worth a thousand tRumps. Dave Bowman Tuesday #27
Bondi will try again Mz Pip Tuesday #28
Dont celebrate yet Smackdown2019 Tuesday #29
At least he should be in a good mood next week............ n/t DFW Wednesday #31
Grand Jury Rebuffs Justice Dept. Attempt to Indict 6 Democrats in Congress (NYT Gift Subscription) LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday #33
Good Botany Wednesday #34
Excellent! Fuck you Pete Hegseth! Initech Wednesday #35
Refuse ILLEGAL Orders, not Legal MineralMan Wednesday #36
Excellent! ShazzieB Wednesday #38
Fix your post Mysterian Wednesday #40
People over power. And ultimately, we the people KPN Wednesday #41
MaddowBlog-Dems enraged after Trump's DOJ targeted veterans with charges of seditious conspiracy LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday #42
I expected this, given the fact that the Uniform Code of Military Justice states this quite clearly. patphil Wednesday #43
No grand jurors found the Trump DOJ met low probable cause threshold in failed indictment of Democratic lawmakers LetMyPeopleVote Wednesday #44
Deadline Legal Blog-Grand jury's refusal to indict Democrats joins a stunning pattern of DOJ rejections LetMyPeopleVote Thursday #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Hayes reporting tha...»Reply #7