Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(166,173 posts)
14. Thankfully
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 04:22 PM
Yesterday

NO President ever gets their verbatim budget request. Saw a NYT article a couple days ago that indicated that -

Congress Is Spurning Many of Trump’s Proposed Spending Cuts

Jan. 14, 2026

Congress is quietly rejecting almost all of the deepest cuts to federal programs that President Trump requested for this year, turning back his efforts to slash funding for foreign aid, global health programs, scientific research, the arts and more in a bipartisan repudiation of his spending plans. The latest rejection of his budget blueprint came on Wednesday, after the House voted 341 to 79 to pass a pair of bills to fund the State and Treasury Departments, as well as other foreign aid programs, providing money for agencies that Mr. Trump had proposed eliminating entirely.

(snip)

“These are bills that reject the devastating cuts Trump demanded in his deeply unserious budget he sent to Congress about a year ago,” said Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee. “When just about every secretary came before our Appropriations Committee to advocate for those Trump funding cuts, I made clear to them I planned to rip up his budget and write a new one — and that is exactly what we are doing.”

(snip)

Whether the administration ultimately spends the money that lawmakers appropriate is still an unanswered question. Russell T. Vought, the White House budget director, has made clear that he believes the president has the authority to disregard congressional directives in order to spend less money than lawmakers approved.

And members of Congress omitted language they had considered including in the legislation aimed at limiting Mr. Trump’s ability to circumvent them. For instance, lawmakers ultimately jettisoned language that senators had tucked into the bill to fund the Commerce and Justice Departments that would have required administration officials to notify lawmakers 30 days before canceling federal contracts or enacting mass layoffs of federal employees. That provision also would have restricted agencies’ ability to use funds approved for one purpose for another, a maneuver known as “reprogramming.”

(snip)


He'll still ignore it and do what he wants but at least there is a crack in Congress.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

lol. Ask a Republican about federal spending and they'll rant about how that "other" sliver needs to be cut unblock Yesterday #1
Okay. But let THEM say that. Then remind them that when, not if, these forces show up, they can't say they weren't told ancianita Yesterday #3
A la Hitler. GreenWave Yesterday #2
When a country can't fix its problems with education and other public services, it resorts to Bev54 Yesterday #4
All I can say is ancianita Yesterday #6
Have you seen anything of the senate hearings to confirm the two commanders ongoing now? Bev54 Yesterday #16
No. But even if I had, they're not make or break decisionmakers for the US military. The UCMJ is. ancianita 13 hrs ago #26
Well said. Trump is the Galtieri of North America. peppertree Yesterday #9
Ugh Joinfortmill 16 hrs ago #23
True. He was your typical, growling Archie Bunker-style mean drunk (but Argentine) peppertree 5 hrs ago #31
Jeezus, what a world. Joinfortmill 5 hrs ago #32
Public Education. Public Health. Public Interest. Kid Berwyn Yesterday #5
All 50 US states still operate public education. All blue states still run public health clinics. ancianita Yesterday #7
Never give up. Kid Berwyn Yesterday #10
WE THE PEOPLE! yellow dahlia 17 hrs ago #21
Looks like they want to make sure the public can be suppressed. calimary Yesterday #8
Sad - but true. peppertree Yesterday #11
It does. ancianita Yesterday #12
Warmongering in a mirror: The U.S. at war with itself. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Yesterday #13
Thankfully BumRushDaShow Yesterday #14
Source of this chart erronis Yesterday #15
Thanks for the more detailed info. ancianita 23 hrs ago #18
police state!! BlueWaveNeverEnd Yesterday #17
AND be sure to show them this .... eppur_se_muova 20 hrs ago #19
Thanks. ancianita 14 hrs ago #24
Sadly, they'd probably approve. progressoid 20 hrs ago #20
Coup d'etat? Joinfortmill 16 hrs ago #22
By whom? ancianita 14 hrs ago #25
CIA. Get it? Joinfortmill 8 hrs ago #29
This message was self-deleted by its author Joinfortmill 8 hrs ago #30
I'm also going with calling them the Comply or Die Party EverHopeful 12 hrs ago #27
Right ON! Everything you say is TRUTH that this era proves irrevocably. ancianita 11 hrs ago #28
I keep telling y'all this: THEY DON'T CARE! It doesn't matter to a significant number of republicans. CTyankee 5 hrs ago #33
But most Americans, and voters, DO care. ancianita 3 hrs ago #34
I'm hoping that the not-fanantical repubs will get sick of these sick people. CTyankee 2 hrs ago #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Beloved DU, take a pictur...»Reply #14