Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Beloved DU, take a picture of this and show it to any Republican, family, friend or whoever. [View all]BumRushDaShow
(166,173 posts)14. Thankfully
NO President ever gets their verbatim budget request. Saw a NYT article a couple days ago that indicated that -
Congress Is Spurning Many of Trumps Proposed Spending Cuts
Jan. 14, 2026
Congress is quietly rejecting almost all of the deepest cuts to federal programs that President Trump requested for this year, turning back his efforts to slash funding for foreign aid, global health programs, scientific research, the arts and more in a bipartisan repudiation of his spending plans. The latest rejection of his budget blueprint came on Wednesday, after the House voted 341 to 79 to pass a pair of bills to fund the State and Treasury Departments, as well as other foreign aid programs, providing money for agencies that Mr. Trump had proposed eliminating entirely.
(snip)
These are bills that reject the devastating cuts Trump demanded in his deeply unserious budget he sent to Congress about a year ago, said Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee. When just about every secretary came before our Appropriations Committee to advocate for those Trump funding cuts, I made clear to them I planned to rip up his budget and write a new one and that is exactly what we are doing.
(snip)
Whether the administration ultimately spends the money that lawmakers appropriate is still an unanswered question. Russell T. Vought, the White House budget director, has made clear that he believes the president has the authority to disregard congressional directives in order to spend less money than lawmakers approved.
And members of Congress omitted language they had considered including in the legislation aimed at limiting Mr. Trumps ability to circumvent them. For instance, lawmakers ultimately jettisoned language that senators had tucked into the bill to fund the Commerce and Justice Departments that would have required administration officials to notify lawmakers 30 days before canceling federal contracts or enacting mass layoffs of federal employees. That provision also would have restricted agencies ability to use funds approved for one purpose for another, a maneuver known as reprogramming.
(snip)
Jan. 14, 2026
Congress is quietly rejecting almost all of the deepest cuts to federal programs that President Trump requested for this year, turning back his efforts to slash funding for foreign aid, global health programs, scientific research, the arts and more in a bipartisan repudiation of his spending plans. The latest rejection of his budget blueprint came on Wednesday, after the House voted 341 to 79 to pass a pair of bills to fund the State and Treasury Departments, as well as other foreign aid programs, providing money for agencies that Mr. Trump had proposed eliminating entirely.
(snip)
These are bills that reject the devastating cuts Trump demanded in his deeply unserious budget he sent to Congress about a year ago, said Senator Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee. When just about every secretary came before our Appropriations Committee to advocate for those Trump funding cuts, I made clear to them I planned to rip up his budget and write a new one and that is exactly what we are doing.
(snip)
Whether the administration ultimately spends the money that lawmakers appropriate is still an unanswered question. Russell T. Vought, the White House budget director, has made clear that he believes the president has the authority to disregard congressional directives in order to spend less money than lawmakers approved.
And members of Congress omitted language they had considered including in the legislation aimed at limiting Mr. Trumps ability to circumvent them. For instance, lawmakers ultimately jettisoned language that senators had tucked into the bill to fund the Commerce and Justice Departments that would have required administration officials to notify lawmakers 30 days before canceling federal contracts or enacting mass layoffs of federal employees. That provision also would have restricted agencies ability to use funds approved for one purpose for another, a maneuver known as reprogramming.
(snip)
He'll still ignore it and do what he wants but at least there is a crack in Congress.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Beloved DU, take a picture of this and show it to any Republican, family, friend or whoever. [View all]
ancianita
Yesterday
OP
lol. Ask a Republican about federal spending and they'll rant about how that "other" sliver needs to be cut
unblock
Yesterday
#1
Okay. But let THEM say that. Then remind them that when, not if, these forces show up, they can't say they weren't told
ancianita
Yesterday
#3
When a country can't fix its problems with education and other public services, it resorts to
Bev54
Yesterday
#4
Have you seen anything of the senate hearings to confirm the two commanders ongoing now?
Bev54
Yesterday
#16
No. But even if I had, they're not make or break decisionmakers for the US military. The UCMJ is.
ancianita
13 hrs ago
#26
True. He was your typical, growling Archie Bunker-style mean drunk (but Argentine)
peppertree
5 hrs ago
#31
All 50 US states still operate public education. All blue states still run public health clinics.
ancianita
Yesterday
#7
I keep telling y'all this: THEY DON'T CARE! It doesn't matter to a significant number of republicans.
CTyankee
5 hrs ago
#33
I'm hoping that the not-fanantical repubs will get sick of these sick people.
CTyankee
2 hrs ago
#35