Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DetroitLegalBeagle

(2,469 posts)
1. It depends
Wed Jan 14, 2026, 10:01 AM
Yesterday

If the damage was during the course recognized and lawful operations, then the property owners insurance is on the hook for it. Doesn't matter if the person was innocent or not, or not even directly involved with the situation. If its a legitimate operation, then it falls under public necessity. If the police were negligent, reckless, or otherwise acting outside the scope of a lawful police action, then they can be held liable for the damages. In practice though, it's a mixed bag on getting courts to side with the property owners or insurance company.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Question: Insurance Companies vs ICE/DHS [View all] Reader Rabbit Yesterday OP
It depends DetroitLegalBeagle Yesterday #1
Good question Sanity Claws Yesterday #2
What they always do. multigraincracker Yesterday #3
Depends on what the policy covers. Check the exclusions. Ocelot II Yesterday #4
The murder last week Norbert Yesterday #5
Good point, smart angle. Why we should film everything when ICE is about. dutch777 Yesterday #6
This government is being ran like the mafia. If Emile Yesterday #7
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question: Insurance Comp...»Reply #1