Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

underpants

(195,107 posts)
2. Two things stood out from the link.
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 06:36 PM
Jan 9

In his testimony, Ross claimed that after he approached Muñoz-Guatemala, the man asked for his attorney.
In court, Eric Newmark, who was representing Muñoz-Guatemala, noted that even government lawyers hadn’t previously heard this assertion. “I think he just made it up on the stand,” Newmark told the judge. “He never said it before. I think he said it for a particular reason”—allegedly to show that Muñoz-Guatemala was aware that he was being apprehended by law enforcement and not attacked by a masked carjacker. A prosecutor in the case conceded that the claim was “grounds for impeachment” against Ross because he “did not previously say that—as far I know.”
—-
“They've got phone trees where they call and then protesters show up.”

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»😱😱㈸...»Reply #2