Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BruceWane

(383 posts)
12. Exactly.
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 11:12 AM
Jan 9

I don't know that the first shot hit her.

Again, think of the angle of the shot.

The first shot hit the vehicle only a few inches from the edge of the windshield. If the first shot missed her, or hit her left shoulder, that would show that he was far enough in front of the vehicle that the shot could be shown to have been justified.

If the first shot hit the victim's head, neck, or center chest, the shooter must have been far enough to the side of the vehicle that he was not in danger.

The second and third shots cannot be shown to have been justified. At all. Even if one is credibly threatened for a moment, you don't get a "grace period" to continue to feel threatened and kill someone when the threat has clearly passed.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

He also casually strolled to his right. No dramatic leap or snap action. unblock Jan 9 #1
You would think after murdering someone, he Emile Jan 9 #2
How do you know the first shot hit her? Ms. Toad Jan 9 #3
Video proves he was not touched by the vehicle. Kingofalldems Jan 9 #8
No. Ms. Toad Jan 9 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author BruceWane Jan 9 #10
Exactly. BruceWane Jan 9 #12
I do know her life was in danger Johonny Jan 9 #4
Thank you Cirsium Jan 9 #19
If this idiot was dragged a half a block by another Emile Jan 9 #5
You'd think he would be put on medical leave FakeNoose Jan 9 #7
I get the feeling crud Jan 9 #11
Not just stupid, the combination of his stupidity and his PTSD karynnj Jan 9 #14
Yes, they are being hired to intentionally do harm and that includes having no compunction in committing murder. littlemissmartypants Jan 9 #20
Your point is correct as well. BruceWane Jan 9 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author Kingofalldems Jan 9 #6
Kick and rec for the "jump in for Trump" crowd. Kingofalldems Jan 9 #9
He will take a plead deal . . . AverageOldGuy Jan 9 #13
Thank you. MIButterfly Jan 9 #21
He has an immagrant wife azureblue Jan 9 #15
First thing he did was pull his gun... kentuck Jan 9 #16
That's exactly what I see too. Emile Jan 9 #32
The Battle of Minneapolis. Marcuse Jan 9 #17
Murderer. tRUMP fascist goon nt wolfie001 Jan 9 #18
The officer could also have been "defending others" gulliver Jan 9 #22
In my opinion you are complicit in idiocy NotHardly Jan 9 #23
I've considered that. BruceWane Jan 9 #24
It seemed like she was given conflicting orders. . . Stargleamer Jan 9 #27
Kick SheltieLover Jan 9 #26
I saw a bullet hole in the side view mirror casing also. Historic NY Jan 9 #28
The vehicle is currently in the Fed's hands dflprincess Jan 9 #29
There will be no trial V850i Jan 9 #30
The first shot, even if it hit her, would not have stopped the vehicle Martin Eden Jan 10 #33
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 10 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Proof the Minnesota ICE G...»Reply #12