Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BoycottTwitter

(114 posts)
31. Musk controls the algorithm, what you see and has our data
Sun Jan 4, 2026, 01:18 AM
Jan 4

My ultimate goal is to make Twitter a ghost town. It's not just a matter of only liberals or Democrats leaving Twitter, it's everyone that should leave except we can leave the hard-right fascists behind because they shouldn't be anywhere but if they have to be somewhere having them quarantined to a toxic dumb is better than having them where we are. Then once Twitter becomes irrelevant I hope they will close their doors and go out of business.

Leading up to the 2024 election Elon Musk was involved in an operation to micro-target Americans and focus on a single issue to divided Democrats and reduce turnout. This led to people focusing on that single issue and reduced turnout. Whenever someone talks about a single issue I think it's important to remind people that candidates have many different policies and it's important to vote for who matches most of your stances, not all your stances. Here's the article about Musk's microtargeting: https://sfl.media/elon-musk-funded-pac-is-using-advanced-micro-targeting-to-swing-voters-for-trump/. See also https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/11/15/republican-ads-false-flag/ or non-paywall link: https://archive.is/k3mKE .

Ultimately Trump's campaign strategy was to "lose less". There was an article I read a long time ago about this, sadly I didn't bookmark it so I don't have it for you but it was really good. This will serve as a substitute: https://www.apr.org/politics-government/2024-11-09/these-charts-show-how-trumps-strategy-to-lose-by-less-won-back-several-swing-states the article I read along time ago explained in a more clear way how the Trump campaign's goal was to reduce enthusiasm among Democrats so they don't turn out. The Trump campaign realized they won't get many new Trump supports so that's what they did: bring down Democrats instead of bring up Republicans.

Musk can remove something he doesn't like at any time. For example when Musk's DOGE was raiding the government DOGE never showed up in the trending section despite it being big news on other platforms and I noticed it seemed like posts related to the illegal things DOGE was doing had less reach on Twitter.

Musk can also subtly alter what kind of content undecided voters see and radicalize them.

Musk can do basically anything since he owns the platform. He's like the casino house.

I wish I could find the discussion but there were some big accounts who were talking about how after Elon Musk bought Twitter all of a sudden their account dropped off almost completely in terms of engagement.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Post removed Post removed Jan 3 #1
And gone. n/t Hellbound Hellhound Jan 3 #2
I actually saw the troll post and alerted mvd Jan 3 #6
I did the same. Hellbound Hellhound Jan 3 #7
Haha. Excellent use of your Saturday. ok_cpu Jan 3 #4
They get $200 Trump Bucks for weekend posting. OAITW r.2.0 Jan 3 #18
I'm having flashbacks to 2003 and "Operation Iraqi Freedom," and they aren't good ones. Vogon_Glory Jan 3 #3
It was originally called MustLoveBeagles Jan 3 #9
O.I.L. OAITW r.2.0 Jan 3 #20
Bingo MustLoveBeagles Jan 3 #22
That's the right stance mvd Jan 3 #5
This is a good posture for Democrats. Recognize that Maduro is a brutal and illegitimate dictator but emphasize tritsofme Jan 3 #8
Just what I was thinking... and State What Cha Jan 3 #14
K&R betsuni Jan 3 #10
Well said, Madam VP mcar Jan 3 #11
KNR niyad Jan 3 #12
K&R spanone Jan 3 #13
Could get ugly moondust Jan 3 #15
My President....and she seems like she is stepping up. OAITW r.2.0 Jan 3 #16
Really powerful statement, Let's see how the media digests this? OAITW r.2.0 Jan 3 #17
Powerful statement but why wasn't it posted to Bluesky? BoycottTwitter Jan 3 #19
Watched in my YT feed....thankfully. OAITW r.2.0 Jan 3 #21
Because she has more than 100x as many followers on X, 20.7M vs 185K. Her post got 4.7M views highplainsdem Jan 4 #24
She has staff. BoycottTwitter Jan 4 #25
I urge people to have Bluesky accounts as well as Twitter accounts. I use both myself because a highplainsdem Jan 4 #27
I agree with you there! BoycottTwitter Jan 4 #32
I get very little "real engagement" on either Twitter or Bluesky... Jack Valentino Jan 4 #30
I've found support for Democrats and Democratic reps on twitter MorbidButterflyTat Jan 4 #26
It's an important platform and shouldn't be ceded to rightwingers, with liberals scattering to much highplainsdem Jan 4 #28
Musk controls the algorithm, what you see and has our data BoycottTwitter Jan 4 #31
Here's her post from X. PLEASE put the link in your OP, or at least in the first reply below, because if highplainsdem Jan 4 #23
Strongest political statement I've seen from her in more than a year.... Jack Valentino Jan 4 #29
"Any such resistance has been too long coming" -- who do you mean hasn't been resisting Trump? Voters? betsuni Jan 4 #33
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 4 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kamala Harris: We've seen...»Reply #31