Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A dark topic, but...the Holocaust wasn't the bloodiest event of WWII, by far. [View all]sir pball
(5,253 posts)20. I'm not saying it was morally equivalent.
Of course the Nazi atrocities were far, far worse by their specific targeting of vulnerable groups.
But losing the entire population of the greater New York metropolitan area to the Nazis isn't really something to ignore.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A dark topic, but...the Holocaust wasn't the bloodiest event of WWII, by far. [View all]
sir pball
Jan 2
OP
Sure but what's the relevance for discussing that in a forum set up to discuss current US politics?
meadowlander
Sunday
#41
Well, for one I was told to post it here, and two, GD is not "current US politics", it's "General Discussion".
sir pball
Monday
#43
hey fyi this kind of score-keeping is often found on paths to Holocaust denialism and/or basic antisemitism and is not a
WhiskeyGrinder
Jan 3
#17
It's also how the nazis keep their victims fighting each other instead of fighting the nazis.
Iggo
Jan 3
#18