Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GCG

(23 posts)
2. Well
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 02:52 PM
Tuesday

Yes, traditional battleships are considered militarily obsolete due to advancements like aircraft carriers and guided missiles, which offer greater range, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness, though the U.S. Navy kept some Iowa-class ships active for shore bombardment and as symbols until the early 1990s, with recent political talk of building new ones. Modern threats, including anti-ship missiles, render their heavy armor less effective, making large, expensive targets vulnerable.

Air Power: Aircraft carriers and land-based airpower proved superior, delivering heavier strikes over vast distances much faster than battleships' guns.

Guided Missiles: The development of long-range, precision-guided missiles made battleships vulnerable, as even their heavy armor couldn't guarantee survival against modern weaponry.

Cost & Efficiency: Maintaining battleships became increasingly expensive, requiring large crews and resources for outdated equipment, while hundreds of aircraft or many missile-equipped destroyers could provide more versatile power for the same cost.

Range Limitations: A battleship's guns could only reach targets within their range (around 20 miles), whereas aircraft and missiles project power hundreds of miles inland or across oceans.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are battleships obsolete?...»Reply #2