Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(8,756 posts)
27. A couple things.
Tue Dec 23, 2025, 01:44 PM
Yesterday

First, I'd like to see a link to the actual document on the DOJ website that contains this.

Second, it's apparently from an FBI intake document, dated October 27, 2020.

The information is presented as allegations and recollections shared with the FBI, not as findings from a trial or conclusions reached by investigators.

It is important to be clear. An FBI intake document records what was reported to the agency. It is not a determination of guilt, and the allegations described have not been adjudicated in court.

https://balleralert.com/profiles/blogs/epstein-files-trump-rape-allegations-suicide/
The timing(immediately before the 2020 election) will certainly make it suspicious to the people who refuse to believe Trump could have done anything wrong.

So this is not necessarily the "smoking gun" many people think it is. Anyone could have made any allegation they wanted to the FBI tip line and it would have been recorded like this. It would help if someone could identify some corroborating information. Like the name of the person who was found to have committed suicide in Kiefer, OK.

I'm not saying this isn't true. To the contrary, I believe this is a pretty strong and believable allegation. I just think people should be cautious about presenting this as proof of anything until more info comes out.

Recommendations

4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If this slipped through the cracks pfitz59 Yesterday #1
Court Docs: sheshe2 Yesterday #21
It's been widely demonstrated that there are very strong reasons to question the authenticity Wiz Imp Yesterday #29
I believe her. The attorney who first represented her was a non-publicity seeking attorney pnwmom Yesterday #32
Me too srobertss Yesterday #45
Things like this disappear every day. Someone files a lawsuit, then signs an NDA pnwmom Yesterday #46
Thanks for the link. What a tangled mess. Raven123 Yesterday #39
This "Katie Johnson" case was never actually litigated FakeNoose Yesterday #42
They had a whole year to get rid of this and they failed. live love laugh Yesterday #25
That's because there is so much in there. AllyCat Yesterday #26
No way there is only one set of all these docs. Tossing them just makes em more guilty. Bengus81 Yesterday #34
Kick dalton99a Yesterday #2
No doubt Republican leadership BOSSHOG Yesterday #3
No one will do anything leftstreet Yesterday #4
You are right BigMin28 Yesterday #5
"THE LEFT KNOWS CLINTON DID IT" durablend Yesterday #9
My response to anyone making that statement is: Lochloosa Yesterday #38
I believe you're correct. MontanaMama Yesterday #6
100% correct. Nothing will happen. Just a Democrat hoax don't ya know chicoescuela Yesterday #17
Not one of the R's will do anything because they're ALL in on it... slightlv Yesterday #48
Yeah. progressoid Yesterday #7
Funny how that works out MustLoveBeagles Yesterday #11
Of course they did something about it. Someone Ilsa Yesterday #12
I question if Pedophile Protectors will grow a spine overnight KS Toronado Yesterday #18
I don't use the sarcasm thing BOSSHOG Yesterday #20
The Guardians Of Pedophiles is their real name. Justice matters. Yesterday #24
No doubt! I'm sure this is the straw that breaks the camel's back!!! LymphocyteLover Yesterday #37
But Just Jerome Yesterday #8
And her emails !! Pluvious Yesterday #15
Wow. underpants Yesterday #10
It's too bad Ilsa Yesterday #13
Even the Repukes are going to be appalled ... at least enough of them will be FakeNoose Yesterday #14
this is just common sense NJCher Yesterday #22
I've always believed he's going down ... FakeNoose Yesterday #40
Is there an easier to read version of this somewhere? nt LAS14 Yesterday #16
I don't know. sheshe2 Yesterday #19
Could this be the way the thugs pushing Project 2025 policy finally get rid of him? NoSheep Yesterday #23
A couple things. Wiz Imp Yesterday #27
I feel the same. Kablooie Yesterday #33
I doubt 10,000 docs would be enough for some people Skittles Yesterday #50
Got another source besides "Kye"? Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #28
Post 21 Court Documents. sheshe2 Yesterday #30
If they are actual court documents, they would be available on the court's website. Nt Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #31
You are saying Bondi would allow certain documents to be viewed. sheshe2 23 hrs ago #53
Yes, someone filed a lawsuit under the name "Katie Johnson" Wiz Imp Yesterday #41
Is that the one with the note on the last page ? GusBob Yesterday #35
I just saw that part Wiz Imp Yesterday #43
Well, I just read this. I had to print it out to actually read it. This is heavy shit, very heavy shit..... ashredux Yesterday #36
The Victim Clouds Passing Yesterday #44
so which reporter will ask ???? RANDYWILDMAN Yesterday #47
I honestly don't know anything about this "Katie Johnson" thing... slightlv Yesterday #49
Download the court filing azureblue Yesterday #51
I can do that but slightlv 23 hrs ago #52
I heard that some of those redactions were done badly Queso Delicioso 21 hrs ago #54
You're right! red dog 1 21 hrs ago #55
I thought there was video of Katie making this claim Jarqui 17 hrs ago #56
I believe the victims. Six117 11 hrs ago #57
My big question here Owens 11 hrs ago #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is no longer rumor c...»Reply #27