Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bluetus

(2,333 posts)
4. Right. The "Forensic Files" program is not even slightly typical
Fri Dec 19, 2025, 10:40 AM
Dec 19

There is no doubt that forensics do solve some crimes. Or more accurately, the forensics may provide the evidence needed for conviction. But the times when detective work and forensics actually discover the perp on their own is surely less than 1% of the murder cases.

The Flock cameras need attention on their own. This is a fast-growing network of cameras that are sold to the public on the basis of enhancing safety. And perhaps in this case, they were part of the solution. But there are now complaints from all over the country where the Flock cameras are being used to track down women seeking reproductive care, Trump's good going after immigrants, etc. But it is not just "bad guys" the cameras are used for. There are cases where law enforcement people used the cameras to track and stalk an ex-girlfriend.

The Flock business case is less about public safety and more about selling data about anybody and everybody to the Big Data corporations. If you drive a car, and live in (or pass through) a large metro area, there is a very high probability that your movements are tracked by Flock cameras, and that data has already been sold to a Big Data company.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How one anonymous tipster...»Reply #4