Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

rsdsharp

(11,804 posts)
31. I know i what the rule is.
Tue Dec 16, 2025, 02:10 PM
Dec 16

Relevance is still the initial threshold.

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(c)(1):

In General. Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case, considering the importance of the issues at stake in the action, the amount in
controversy, the parties’ relative access to relevant information, the parties’ resources, the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable.


Discovery is not a fishing expedition, and a court can enter orders limiting or denying discovery on certain issues.

On motion by a party or by the person from whom discovery is sought, and for good cause shown, the court in which the action is pending may make any order to
protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense that justice requires,


Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(d)(1).

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 is virtually identical.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think he'll drop the suit rather than comply. QED Dec 15 #1
Boom! MorbidButterflyTat Dec 15 #2
In 2 weeks! sheshe2 Dec 16 #27
That's The Whole Point. GB_RN Dec 16 #30
K&R UTUSN Dec 15 #3
GOTCHA vapor2 Dec 15 #4
Long overdue. How many institutions who caved could have done the same? bucolic_frolic Dec 15 #5
Ummmm.... psssst... ZDU Dec 15 #6
That pesky discovery thingy just bit him in the ass Brother Buzz Dec 15 #7
For all the ridiculous lawsuits he has filed in his life, PatSeg Dec 15 #10
He does know better, but filing a lawsuit garners the ink and is read meat for Brother Buzz Dec 15 #15
That is probably true PatSeg Dec 15 #18
Michael Cohen said the same thing ... and that's why Chump's threats don't scare him FakeNoose Dec 15 #13
I find this amusing, but I don't see how any of this is relevant to the issues in the suit. rsdsharp Dec 15 #8
Trump is claiming that he was damaged by the Board's actions TubbersUK Dec 15 #17
The rule, in short dpibel Dec 16 #26
I know i what the rule is. rsdsharp Dec 16 #31
Whoa, they ain't messing around PatSeg Dec 15 #9
Orange man sues everyone BlueWaveNeverEnd Dec 15 #11
He'll plead "National Security". Can't let the enemies (the American people) see his weaknesses! erronis Dec 15 #12
Whew--glad that I misread that subject line! Orrex Dec 15 #14
Ha..now there is good use of the Figarosmom Dec 15 #16
when does he EVER comply? Skittles Dec 15 #22
And many did. Nt Figarosmom Dec 16 #23
He'll challenge the request. The judge will rule in his favor. He is not complying or dropping the suit onenote Dec 16 #25
K&R spanone Dec 15 #19
Oh, that has released the cat among the pigeons! mwmisses4289 Dec 15 #20
I LOVE THIS Skittles Dec 15 #21
Okeechobee County is deep red. 76.5 percent voted for Trump onenote Dec 16 #24
Check....................................................................................... sheshe2 Dec 16 #28
That's how to get him to drop a lawsuit JoseBalow Dec 16 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pulitzer Board dumps broa...»Reply #31