Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

quaker bill

(8,262 posts)
9. Much more than 30 years ago
Thu Apr 10, 2025, 07:55 AM
Apr 2025

Back in the day when they were used as a major source of revenue, industries were local. In short, we made stuff here out of resources we gathered here. They made stuff there out of resources they gathered there. There was no such thing as a just in time inventory system that sourced components from across the planet, no one could even do business remotely that way.

In that context, a tariff might protect a local industry cleanly by making competitive foriegn goods more expensive. Today, in that food, resources, and components are sourced globally, tariffs raise the prices for both domestic and foreign produced goods indiscriminately in varying amounts. in that parts and components might even cross a border more than once, there are potential compounding effects. Let's say the steel comes here and is tariffed at the border, it is then cut and stamped into parts here which are then shipped to Canada or Mexico for assembly being tariffed at the border, the assembled parts are then shipped back to be further assembled into a car here, tariffed again at the border....

These are simply an archaic idea that was never all that good in the first place

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tariffs may have been a g...»Reply #9