Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yellow dahlia

(4,218 posts)
5. It identifies Musk in his official capacity at DOGE.
Fri Mar 28, 2025, 07:28 PM
Mar 2025

I thought they said he wasn't in charge of DOGE. Because if he is, then he would have to divulge his conflicts of interest - right?

And the court says the stay would cause harm for Musk and DOGE - Aaargh! That's backwards.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»JUST IN: The 4th circuit ...»Reply #5