General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tim Walz backs David Hogg for DNC vice chair [View all]Oopsie Daisy
(4,692 posts)Democrats and 'progressives' are often viewed as interconnected or aligned in many contexts. These terms are closely intertwined or aligned within the political landscape. While Democrats constitute a political party with a broad spectrum of ideologies and members, 'progressives' typically represent a subset within the party.
I can assure you that the "progressive" politics of Vermont will not win elections in the midwest. Democrats are NOT a homogeneous group or political party. Blaming our party's shortcomings and failures on the ineffectiveness of "progressives" to rule the roost is a mistake. Blaming it on the age of our experienced politicians and statesmen/women is also a mistake.
It takes a village. The "progressive" wing of the Democratic party is not going to "take over" the party and they're not going to be gifted positions which they have not earned. If it were a homogeneous Vermont-style political party, we would lose even more elections. That's not what you want, is it?
>> Seems to me we've damaged ourselves pretty badly internally.
Gee. Then why support someone who's only going to create more division? Weird, that.