Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Tim Walz backs David Hogg for DNC vice chair [View all]karynnj
(60,043 posts)58. CW was she would pick Evan Bayh, not Obama
I think she would have won because, by the time of the general election, the economy not Iraq was the main issue. Even if Iraq remained the top issue, the tide was turning on that and I doubt McCain would adopt a less prowar position. It may be that 2008 was the most likely for Democrats to win since 1996.
It's impossible to even guess what that term would be like. But you need to go back to FDR to have a party win 4 times in a row.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes you are probably right, I have deleted most of my replies here... carry on😁
Meowmee
19 hrs ago
#102
You should delete your admittedly unfounded smear and stick to the facts about
Maru Kitteh
20 hrs ago
#90
I have never heard this, but he's young and has been solidly liberal for years
Polybius
Yesterday
#46
We fucking need someone with a track record of leadership and building coalitions. Not nearly fucking enough experience
SoFlaBro
Yesterday
#2
I agree! We lifelong (D) need to turn leadership over to the next generation.They are going to live in the.....
usaf-vet
Yesterday
#13
yes, please give it to the kids who will inherit climate change frome us
MadameButterfly
Yesterday
#15
We tried that "track-record" garbage, we need people with strong progressive instincts,...
Think. Again.
Yesterday
#17
But if Hillary had won that nomination, things would likely have gone like this:
Polybius
Yesterday
#50
I don't know how the 2012 election would have went, but I feel strongly about the 2008 one
Polybius
Yesterday
#61
Only once in the last 75 years has the same party won three elections in a row
MichMan
20 hrs ago
#93
It's time to shed some of the old school, status quo "leadership" and coalition building
lees1975
Yesterday
#66
Six year terms is seen as a way to retire a millionaire. Many stop doing what was best...
usaf-vet
Yesterday
#14
I found him quite impressive and full of great ideas in a recent MSNBC interview.
summer_in_TX
17 hrs ago
#104
I think that would be a good choice. We definitely need some fresh blood in the pipeline. He's been an
Vinca
Yesterday
#27
I think David is amazing. He did the March for your Lives and tried to get better gun control.
TommieMommy
Yesterday
#28
No way. Someone with relevant experience needs to be in that role. Have him in a junior role to learn.
themaguffin
Yesterday
#29
Yes, but in an organization, that's not what a junior role is. You're speaking in relative terms, I'm referring to its
themaguffin
Yesterday
#60
I know that & "vice" is only "junior" to the chair." He needs a junior role. I assumed wrong that people knew what that
themaguffin
Yesterday
#55
Absolutely not. He lacks the experience and temperament needed for the job.
Oopsie Daisy
Yesterday
#32
Vice-Chair is not the place to start his "mentoring" project or as a place for OJT and skill-honing.
Oopsie Daisy
Yesterday
#57
Three of the following candidates will be chosen as a Vice Chair: Joe Barbuto, Artie Blanco, Waikinya Clanton, Shasti
Celerity
Yesterday
#33
That would be a gold mine for repub strategists in battleground and near-battleground states. nt
LexVegas
Yesterday
#47
Well, we do have a 74-year-old undergoing treatment for esophageal cancer but he's otherwise occupied nt
Rob H.
23 hrs ago
#70
I think it is important that the Democratic Party become more progressive. We have
walkingman
Yesterday
#56
I don't disagree with you at all, but what will it take to get those people you describe to the polls?
walkingman
22 hrs ago
#72
Ah, yes... ageism and "Blame Democrats First". Burn it down, eh? That'll fix everything, won't it?
Oopsie Daisy
10 hrs ago
#110
Age is just a number, I'm sure you know that. It's experience and intent that matters.
Oopsie Daisy
9 hrs ago
#114
Why do people assume the Democratic Party is majority ancient conservative straight white men?
betsuni
Yesterday
#69
It's wild that "Don't trust anyone over 30" has morphed into "Don't trust anyone under 60." nt
Rob H.
23 hrs ago
#71
No, what's "really wild" is how people are ignoring his offensive and grating temperament and his *
Oopsie Daisy
11 hrs ago
#108
Democrats and 'progressives' are often viewed as interconnected or aligned in many contexts *
Oopsie Daisy
9 hrs ago
#115