Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We are fact checkers! Clouds Passing Yesterday #1
What power do you have? Renew Deal 10 hrs ago #52
We have the power, at this point, to check sources of real info. Clouds Passing 10 hrs ago #54
disinfo as an alert category is probably a good idea orleans 8 hrs ago #68
YES! There should be a "dis/misinfo alert category. Think. Again. 8 hrs ago #71
Disinformation should be an alert category, imo Maru Kitteh 4 hrs ago #99
Agree blm 51 min ago #101
when i'm wrong i hear about it fairly quickly rampartd Yesterday #2
same Skittles Yesterday #9
I get my butt kicked here all the time. Irish_Dem 22 hrs ago #26
Me too, and I usually appreciate it. yardwork 10 hrs ago #51
But there is plenty of gaslighting.... Think. Again. 8 hrs ago #72
Sure. Lots of people pushing agendas. yardwork 8 hrs ago #73
Yes, lots. Think. Again. 8 hrs ago #75
I get warning DeepWinter 8 hrs ago #70
Are you married? True Dough 8 hrs ago #77
next you guys will start with the "i told yu so" n/t rampartd 4 hrs ago #97
Yes SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #3
from what I can tell, we DO fact-check each other Skittles Yesterday #4
No. Fact-checking is what Reply Boxes are for. I also think that is true on Facebook, X, etc. Silent Type Yesterday #5
DUers are good at looking for errors. Haggard Celine Yesterday #6
There is nothing in the TOS against spreading misinformation Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #7
but it DOES get called out here Skittles Yesterday #10
Go ahead and post spreading misinformation William769 10 hrs ago #58
I have seen posts with provably false information rise to the top of the greatest page Fiendish Thingy 9 hrs ago #63
I have seen DU Administrators toss people for this very fact William769 9 hrs ago #64
Nope JustAnotherGen Yesterday #8
We have spell checkers and grammarians. cachukis Yesterday #11
Are you volunteering? canetoad Yesterday #12
You just volunteered to be a fact checker DBoon Yesterday #13
I think we do need an OP alert option for misinformation and disinformation Emrys Yesterday #14
Well said 👏 SocialDemocrat61 Yesterday #19
Then, even after being called out for misinformation, they continue to post it again and again MichMan 7 hrs ago #90
Every one of the people reading this is a fact checker.... William Gustafson Yesterday #15
You're a very trusting soul. Think. Again. 8 hrs ago #74
We need more receptiveness to being fact-checked on issues of confirmation bias. Ms. Toad Yesterday #16
FACT CHECK: Trump Wrongly States Obama Administration Had Child Separation Policy W_HAMILTON 22 hrs ago #25
Thank you for making my point. Ms. Toad 22 hrs ago #31
I think this exchange is a good example of how well DUers fact check one another. yardwork 10 hrs ago #56
The problem I have is the "facts don't matter" nature of the response. Ms. Toad 9 hrs ago #66
To me, that's a good example of differing opinions. yardwork 8 hrs ago #69
It is not an example of differing opinions, because I didn't express any. Ms. Toad 8 hrs ago #81
👏 "We also need more of us to read past the headline, even if it is just the content in the post. Better yet... chia 10 hrs ago #60
Greater need for FUD checkers IMO. nt Disaffected Yesterday #17
I have received several corrections over the years. SamKnause Yesterday #18
Not really. Many times I'm on DU while cable is on and we're quite often... brush Yesterday #20
We are the fact-checkers, & do a pretty good job of it. It's outlined in the TOS... Hekate Yesterday #21
The Sam Vimes series is my absolute favorite! LearnedHand 21 hrs ago #34
The Witches and the City Watch -- impossible to choose, so I reread them all over time Hekate 21 hrs ago #37
Doesn't the woman who played Lady Mary LearnedHand 21 hrs ago #39
Well spotted! I was blown away when I figured that out. I think there's a consistency in personality, too. Hekate 21 hrs ago #41
Please tell me! Unwind Your Mind 8 hrs ago #78
Sir Terry Pratchett and the series is Discworld. Start with The Color of Magic. yellowdogintexas 7 hrs ago #86
Thank you Unwind Your Mind 7 hrs ago #89
This would be a good spot for everyone's favorite Discworld character(s) Mine is The Luggage yellowdogintexas 7 hrs ago #87
Granny Weatherwax. Wyrd Sisters was good, but Witches Abroad included a send-up on Hemingway... Hekate 5 hrs ago #96
In the football forum, 100%. Xavier Breath Yesterday #22
There is one big difference between us and them: surfered 23 hrs ago #23
I agree, but the problem is "they" are here too. Think. Again. 8 hrs ago #80
Without formal fact checking SocialDemocrat61 23 hrs ago #24
Nah. Moderation, alert juries, and admin take care serious "back and forths". I stay out of the mosh pits. marble falls 22 hrs ago #28
No. We should respect and embrace the truth SocialDemocrat61 22 hrs ago #32
We do -- otherwise I wouldn't have stuck around for 22+ years Hekate 21 hrs ago #40
I've served on juries SocialDemocrat61 17 hrs ago #46
I'm not afraid of any such thing, as long as there are funds to pay "formal fact checkers" Hekate 16 hrs ago #47
Good, No one should be afraid of objective fact checking SocialDemocrat61 13 hrs ago #48
I'll chime in here EarlG 5 hrs ago #91
I think Facebook, X and other social media sites should have fact checking too SocialDemocrat61 5 hrs ago #92
Understood EarlG 5 hrs ago #94
That's fair SocialDemocrat61 5 hrs ago #95
Excellently explained, EarlG Hekate 56 min ago #100
DUers are well capable of factchecking this board LearnedHand 21 hrs ago #35
While true at the moment SocialDemocrat61 17 hrs ago #45
agree with Social Democrat Tetrachloride 8 hrs ago #83
I trust the people here. I HAVE seen/read that someone calls-out someone else.But.... chouchou 22 hrs ago #27
I get cuffed about on occasion BOSSHOG 22 hrs ago #29
Yes krawhitham 22 hrs ago #30
We DO! elleng 22 hrs ago #33
Nope... I've returned and I work pro bono Blue_Tires 21 hrs ago #36
There are fact checkers and there are nit-pickers. Nit pickers are worse. MMBeilis 21 hrs ago #38
I'm skilled at both depending on which is called for Blue_Tires 20 hrs ago #42
Nitpicking defined as SocialDemocrat61 11 hrs ago #49
we already have some RussBLib 20 hrs ago #43
What brought this on? niyad 19 hrs ago #44
Not sure for them, but I was just thinking about it. Renew Deal 10 hrs ago #53
Absolutely. I've pointed out false info OPs so often (as did others in the threads) & the OP just leaves the bollocks up Celerity 10 hrs ago #59
The alert category is "right wing talking points," hedda_foil 9 hrs ago #62
That rules doesn't apply to the disinfo I'm talking about. Renew Deal 9 hrs ago #67
Yes, that info is usually propaganda meant to sway people. However, when posted here it either: LeftInTX 8 hrs ago #85
I've posted a much lengthier response upthread EarlG 5 hrs ago #93
I once forgot to post a URL with a news story. Jacson6 10 hrs ago #50
If we were a bunch of liars and conspiracy theorists, I'd say yes. But we're not, so no. Vinca 10 hrs ago #55
I think what is needed everywhere nationwide genxlib 10 hrs ago #57
No flvegan 10 hrs ago #61
Over the years... kentuck 9 hrs ago #65
Too often when posts are "good news" on our part, they stay up besides not being factual or provable. LeftInTX 8 hrs ago #76
Don't think so, since this is an opinion site and not a factual site. republianmushroom 8 hrs ago #79
Will it have a "splitting hairs" component? Will everyone be able to scold other DUers? FSogol 8 hrs ago #82
Yes. The shit people fall for... demmiblue 8 hrs ago #84
Agree Kaleva 4 hrs ago #98
No. We have knowledgeable members & a good jury system. "Coffee lady" 😳 underpants 7 hrs ago #88
No, we need DU Crystal Ball so we can predict 2025 and beyond. bucolic_frolic 28 min ago #102
no Groundhawg 12 min ago #103
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Do we need fact-checkers ...»Reply #19